Why Teacher Job Satisfaction Matters: Strengthening Head Teachers’ Transformational Leadership in Sustainable Development Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2024v13i3.p31-50Palavras-chave:
education quality, transformational leadership, teacher job satisfaction, sustainable development educationResumo
Achieving Cluster School of Excellence (CSE) status relies on teachers’ job satisfaction. This facet is crucial in driving the school towards its goals. This research employs a mixed-methods approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative measures. The quantitative phase includes 177 teachers from six CSE primary schools in Kota Setar, Kedah, Malaysia. In contrast, the qualitative phase involves in-depth interviews with 20 teachers. In the quantitative phase, this study employed two questionnaire instruments, the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) and the Job Satisfaction Index (JSI). These instruments were utilised to assess headteachers’ transformational leadership level and job satisfaction in school. Within the qualitative phase, the researchers employed a semi-structured questionnaire to categorise positive and negative ideas regarding the four aspects of transformational leadership. The quantitative results indicated that four transformational leadership dimensions significantly relate to teacher job satisfaction explicitly: charisma (idealised influence), intellectual stimulation, individual consideration, and inspirational motivation. The qualitative results based on content analysis showed the frequency of responses for each dimension as follows: charisma (affirmative = 120, negative = 15), intellectual stimulation (affirmative = 80, negative = 15), individual consideration (affirmative = 70, negative = 16), and inspirational Motivation (affirmative = 40, negative = 16). The study concludes that the critical role of transformational leadership in promoting job satisfaction among teachers is crucial for achieving CSE status. The substantial correlations between teacher job satisfaction and the transformational leadership dimensions emphasise the significance of effective leadership in the school ecosystem. As a result, improving transformational leadership practices within schools can result in a more motivated and contented teaching workforce, contributing to the school’s overall success.
Referências
Afsar B, Umrani W. Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Eur J Innov Manag. 2019;30-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2018-0257
Alessa G. The dimensions of transformational leadership and its organisational effects in public universities in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682092
Ali M, Ismail R. Amalan kepimpinan sekolah berprestasi tinggi (sbt) di Malaysia [High performance school leadership practices (HPS) in Malaysia]. J Edupress. 2015;1:323-335.
Alzoraiki M, Ahmad AR, Ateeq A, Milhem M. The role of transformational leadership in enhancing school culture and teaching performance in Yemeni public schools. Front Educ. 2024;9:1413607. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1413607
Anoop KP, Ying W. The effects of transformational leadership and organisational climate with teachers’ motivation. Malaysian J Soc Sci Humanit. 2016;3(2):1-16. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v3i2.70
Ansley B, Houchins D, Varjas K. Cultivating positive work contexts that promote teacher job satisfaction and retention in high-need schools. J Spec Educ Leadersh. 2019;32:3-16.
Arslan Y, Polat S, Gürler M, Bulut I. Unethical behaviors of school principals according to teachers’ views: Causes and recommendations for prevention. Int J Psychol Educ Stud. 2024;11(1):50-65. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2024.11.1.1303
Astutik EV, Karwanto. Gaya kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah dalam upaya meningkatkan kepuasan kerja guru SMA [The transformational leadership style of the principal in an effort to increase the job satisfaction of high school teachers]. J Inspir Manag Pendidikan. 2020;8(4):545-557. https://doi.org/10.26740/jdmp.v1n1.p7-14
Avolio BJ, Bass BM. Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sampler set. 3rd ed. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden; 2004.
Bass BM. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press; 1985.
Bass B, Avolio B. Transformational leadership and organisational culture. Public Adm Q. 1993;17:112-121.
Bernarto I, Bachtiar D, Sudibjo N, Suryawan IN, Purwanto A, Asbari MM. Effect of transformational leadership, perceived organisational support, job satisfaction toward life satisfaction: Evidence from Indonesian teachers. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2020;29(03):5495-5503.
Bormann KC, Diebig M. Following an uneven lead: Trickle-down effect of differentiated transformational leadership. J Manag. 2020;20(2):1-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320931584
Brayfield AH, Rothe HF. An index of job satisfaction. J Appl Psychol. 1951;35(5):307-311. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617
Briganti P, de Gennaro D, Buonocore F, Varriale L. Job (dis)satisfaction in pay-for-performance healthcare contexts: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature. Int J Public Sect Manag. 2023;36(6/7):606-631. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2023-0061
Burns JM. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row; 1978.
Bush T. Assessing successful school leadership: What do we know? Educ Manag Adm Leadersh. 2021;49:687-689. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211034675
Cansoy R. The relationship between school principals’ leadership behaviours and teachers’ job satisfaction: A systematic review. Int Educ Stud. 2018;12(1):37-52.
Chua J, Ayoko OB. Employees’ self-determined motivation, transformational leadership and work engagement. J Manag Organ. 2021;27(3):523-543. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.74
Dekawati I, Pujiyati W, Sitoresmi S. The influence of principal’s role and work motivation on teacher job satisfaction. Int J Educ Manag Innov. 2021;2(1):100-115. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v2i1.3215
Djatmiko T, Prasetio AP, Sofa MN. Work stress, job satisfaction and turnover intention in public telecommunication company. Human Resource Dev Int. 2019;65(Icebef 2018):668-673. https://doi.org/10.2991/icebef-18.2019.143
Eng Fei EL, Han CGK. The relationship of principals’ leadership and school climate with teachers’ motivation. Malaysian J Soc Sci Humanit. 2018;3(2):1-16. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v3i2.70
Ertekin H, Yüksel M, Karakeçi Ç, Polat SK, Yardımcı R. Eğitim yönetiminde disiplin sorunlarının nedenleri ve çözümüne yönelik yaklaşımların incelenmesi. J Soc Res Behav Sci. 2023;9(18):435-445. https://doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.9.18.29
Fei ELE, Han CGK. Hubungan kepimpinan pengetua dan iklim sekolah dengan motivasi guru. Malaysian J Soc Sci Humanit. 2018;3(2):1-16.
Gougas V, Malinova L. School leadership models and tools: A review. Open J Soc Sci. 2021;9:120-139. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.91009
Guchait P, Paşamehmetoğlu A, Madera J. Error management culture: impact on cohesion, stress, and turnover intentions. Serv Ind J. 2016;36(3-4):124-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2016.1158253
Hardianto H. Optimalisasi kepuasan kerja guru. Kelola: J Manajemen Pendidikan. 2018;5(2):190-195. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2018.v5.i2.p190-195
Igunnu AA. Leadership styles and job performance among administrative heads of secondary schools. Univ Acad Res J. 2020;2(1):38-45.
Jamilah A, Yusof B. Amalan kepimpinan sekolah berprestasi tinggi (SBT) di Malaysia. J Edupres. 2011;1:323-335.
Jasiński AM, Derbis R. Work stressors and intention to leave the current workplace and profession: The mediating role of negative affect at work. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113992
Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas. 1970;30:607-610.
Lee MH, Swaner LE. Supportive leadership, teacher wellness, and school promotion. J Res Christ Educ. 2023;32(3):131-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2023.2284798
Madrid H, Barros E, Vasquez C. The emotion regulation roots of job satisfaction. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609933
Mahdi A, Aiyub Darmawati. Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan transaksional dan transformasional terhadap kinerja guru dengan kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel intervening pada SMK negeri di Aceh Utara. J Manajemen Indonesia (J-Mind). 2021;5(2):26-42.
Maas J, Schoch S, Scholz U, et al. Teachers’ perceived time pressure, emotional exhaustion, and the role of social support from the school principal. Soc Psychol Educ. 2021;24:441-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09605-8
Ministry of Education. Malaysian education development plan 2013-2025 (Preschool education through secondary. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education; 2013.
Ministry of Education. Malaysian education development plan 2013-2025: Annual report 2017. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education; 2018.
Munian S, Hasan S. Hubungan antara kepimpinan transformasi guru besar dengan komitmen kerja dalam kalangan guru sekolah rendah di Daerah Kulim Bandar Baharu, Kedah. Malaysian J Soc Sci Humanit. 2020;5(6):136-150. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i6.434
Rahman MN, Noor WN. Pelaksanaan kurikulum standard prasekolah kebangsaan semakan 2017: Retrospeksi guru. JuPiDi: J Kepimpinan Pendidikan. 2018;5(3):59-71.
Rai J, Beresford-Dey M. School leadership in the United Arab Emirates: A scoping review. Educ Manag Adm Leadersh. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231218129
Rijal Fahmi AK, Yuwanita A, Nur Faiza DE. Principal transformational leadership in improving teacher and school staff performance. Int Res-Based Educ J. 2021;3(1):23-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um043v1i1p22-27
Sahid A, Amirullah I, Khaeriyah K, Natsir N, Syafaruddin S, Tinggi S, et al. Transformational leadership in organisational change. Int J Econ Manag Res. 2023;2(2):1-6. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v2i2.110
Saks K, Hunt P, Leijen Ä, Lepp L. To stay or not to stay: An empirical model for predicting teacher persistence. Br J Educ Stud. 2022;70(6):693-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2021.2004995
Shava GN. Principal leadership and school performance: Integrating instructional and transformational leadership in South African schools. Int J Educ Learn. 2021;3(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v3i1.119
Skaalvik EM, Skaalvik S. Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teach Teach Educ. 2017;67:152-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006
Sucuoğlu E, Uluğ M. The effects of leadership behaviors of secondary school administrators on staff job satisfaction in TRNC. Sustainability. 2022;14(21):1-10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113989
Suryawan IGR, Ardana IK, Suwandana IGM. Transformational leadership, work stress and turnover intention: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Am J Humanit Soc Sci Res. 2021;5(1):146-157.
Tang C, Wider W, Cheng KW, Chan CK, Jiang L. Leadership style and employee performance in China’s fast moving consumer goods industry. Humanit Soc Sci Lett. 2024;12(1):77-87.
Türkoğlu ME, Cansoy R, Parlar H. Examining relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Univ J Educ Res. 2017;5(5):765-722.
Udin U. Transformational leadership and organisational commitment: A review of literature. J Res Opin. 2020;7(2):2623-2626. https://doi.org/10.15520/jro.v7i2.49
Waal-Andrews W, Vugt M. The triad model of follower needs: Theory and review. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020;33:142-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.006
You S, Kim AY, Lim SA. Job satisfaction among secondary teachers in Korea: Effects of teachers’ sense of efficacy and school culture. Educ Manag Adm Leadersh. 2017;45(2):284-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215587311
Yuliastuti LA, Felita AV, Nawangsari DC, Wulandari RA, Ningrum RLK, Wulandari A, et al. Kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kinerja guru. TSAQOFAH. 2023;4(1):501-515. https://doi.org/10.58578/tsaqofah.v4i1.2257
Zhang J. Exploring the impact of transformational school leadership on teacher job satisfaction. Int J Educ Humanit. 2023;8(1):39-42. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v8i1.6875
Zhang L. Teachers, students, and teaching: Towards an ecological system. Educ Psychol. 2020;40:249-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1731146
Zhao X, Wider W, Zhang X, Fauzi MA, Wong CH, Jiang L, et al. Triggering Chinese lecturers’ intrinsic work motivation by value-based leadership and growth mindset: Generation difference by using multigroup analysis. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297791
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Marni Marni, Khairul Hafezad Abdullah, Mohd Faiz Mohd Faiz Mohd Yaakob, Mohd Sofian Omar Fauzee, Syahira Fairishmar Jamil, Mohamad Al Zubaidi, Daljit Singh Gurbaksh
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional. 
