Qualitative Aspects of Biogas Production in a Small-Scale Biodigester by Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste from University Environment

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2022v11i1.p31-38

Palabras clave:

biogás, biorreatores de pequena escala, sustentabilidade, resíduos sólidos domésticos, energia renovável

Resumen

Organic waste are materials that, in balanced natural environments, spontaneously degrade and recycle nutrients in nature's processes. The adoption of appropriate methods for the management of organic waste is essential for urban, peri-urban and rural development. The use of Small-scale biodigestion systems in urban areas and mainly in rural areas is a real alternative. Biogas is a renewable source of energy used as a substitute for natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas. From the anaerobic decomposition of different types of biomass and substrates, we have the metabolic product called biogas, a mixture of methane, carbon dioxide and small amounts of other gases such as hydrogen sulfide. The quality of the biogas generated has a direct effect on its use as an energy source, requiring a minimum fraction of CH4 for its combustion and for other processes such as the transformation of the biogas generated into biofuel, its purification to remove the portions of other gases present its necessary. This work evaluated the quality of the biogas generated in a small-scale biodigester, based on the decomposition of food waste from the university environment. A mobile laboratory analyzed the composition of the biogas generated. The results showed that this substrate and its heterogeneity has enormous potential for generating biogas with excellent amounts of methane CH4 composition minimum value was 58.46%, the maximum reached 68.41% and the average was 65.44%. Regarding the presence of CO2 within the biogas evaluated, the minimum value of CO2 was 38.02%; the maximum value was 44.39% and the average stayed in 38.55%. Hydrogen in the composition minimum value was 7.41 ppm, 13.42 ppm maximum and average of 9.63 ppm. H2S minimum value obtained was 0.0 ppm, reaching the maximum value of 249.76 ppm, with average of 138.75 ppm.

Citas

Ali, Rowayda, and Rashed Al-Sa’ed. 2018. “Pilot-Scale Anaerobic Digester for Enhanced Biogas Production from Poultry Manure Using a Solar Water Heating System.” International Journal of Environmental Studies 75 (1): 201–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2017.1392766.
Alves, Ingrid Roberta de França Soares. 2008. “Análise Experimental Do Potencial de Geração de Biogás Em Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos.” Universidade Federal de Pernambuco.
Demaziere, Christophe. 2020. “Green City Branding or Achieving Sustainable Urban Development? Reflections of Two Winning Cities of the European Green Capital Award: Stockholm and Hamburg.” Town Planning Review 91 (4): 373–95. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2020.22.
Farhat, Amel, Baligh Miladi, Moktar Hamdi, and Hassib Bouallagui. 2018. “Fermentative Hydrogen and Methane Co-Production from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Organic Wastes at High Loading Rate Coupling Continuously and Sequencing Batch Digesters.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (28): 27945–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2796-2.
Konrad, Odorico;, Camila; Hasan, Marildo; Guerini, and Marluce. Lumi. 2016. Atlas Das Biomassas Do Rio Grande Do Sul Para Produção de Biogás e Biometano. 1st ed. Lajeado: Ed. da Univates.
Konrad, Odorico, João Vicente Akwa, Fábio Fernandes Koch, Marluce Lumi, and Jaqueline Tonetto. 2016. “Quantificação e Caracterização Da Produção de Biogás a Partir de Misturas de Resíduos Agroindustriais Em Uma Planta de Demonstração Em Larga Escala.” Acta Scientiarum - Technology 38 (4): 415–21. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v38i4.28649.
Kunz, Airton. 2019. Fundamentos Da Digestão Anaeróbia, Purificação Do Biogás, Uso e Tratamento Do Digestato. Edited by Sbera. Concórdia: Embrapa Suinos e Aves.
Lansing, Stephanie;, Jay F.; Martin, Raúl; Botero, Tatiana Nogueira da; Silva, and Ederson Dias da. Silva. 2010. “Methane Production in Low-Cost, Unheated, Plug-Flow Digesters Treating Swine Manure and Used Cooking Grease.” Elsevier 101 (12): 4362–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.100.
Martins das Neves, L.C.; Converti, A.; Vessoni Penna, T.C. 2009. “Biogas Production: New Trends for Alternative Energy Sources in Rural and Urban Zones.” Chemical Engineering & Technology 32 (8): 1147–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.200900051.
Oliveira, Luiz Gustavo Silva De, and Simona O. Negro. 2019. “Contextual Structures and Interaction Dynamics in the Brazilian Biogas Innovation System.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.030.
Rajendran, Karthik.;, Solmaz.; Aslanzadeh, and Mohammad J.; Taherzadeh. 2012. Household Biogas Digesters-A Review. Energies. Vol. 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5082911.
Ramatsa, Ishmael M, Esther T Akinlabi, Daniel M Madyira, and Robert Huberts. 2014. “DESIGN OF THE BIO-DIGESTER FOR BIOGAS PRODUCTION : REVIEW,” no. January.
Roubík, H., and J. Mazancová. 2019. “Small-Scale Biogas Plants in Central Vietnam and Biogas Appliances with a Focus on a Flue Gas Analysis of Biogas Cook Stoves.” Renewable Energy 131: 1138–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.054.
Scarlat, Nicolae, Jean François Dallemand, and Fernando Fahl. 2018. “Biogas: Developments and Perspectives in Europe.” Renewable Energy 129: 457–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.006.
Silva, C.L.;, J.M.; Rabelo, V.; Ramazzotte, L.F. & Rossi, and H.A. Bollaman. 2009. “A Cadeia de Biogás e a Sustentabilidade Local: Uma Análise Socioeconômica Ambiental Da Energia de Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos Do Aterro Da Caximba Em Curitiba. Innovar, 19(34), 83-98.”
Silva, Claudionor De Oliveira, Odorico Konrad, Nélia Henriques Callado, Munique Marder, and Liz Geise Santos de Araujo. 2020. “Resíduos Sólidos Orgânicos Domésticos Como Substrato Potencial Para Produção de Biogás.” Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciências Ambientais 11 (2): 204–12. https://doi.org/10.6008/cbpc2179-6858.2020.002.0022.
VITA. 1985. “Testing the Efficiency of Wood Burning Stoves: International Standards; Volunteers in Technical Assitance.” Inc.: Arlington, TX, USA,.
Wang, Chuqiao, Feng Hong, Yong Lu, Xianning Li, and Hengming Liu. 2017. “Improved Biogas Production and Biodegradation of Oilseed Rape Straw by Using Kitchen Waste and Duck Droppings as Co-Substrates in Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion.” PLoS ONE 12 (8): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182361.
Xavier, Sandhya;, and Krishna. Nand. 1990. “A Preliminary Study on Biogas Production from Cowdung Using Fixed-Bed Digesters” 34 (2): 161–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(90)90016-L.

Descargas

Publicado

2022-04-29

Cómo citar

SILVA, Carlos Emílio Vieira da; MARDER, Munique; HICKMAN, Eugênia Vargas; OLIVEIRA, Guilherme Moraes de; KONRAD, Odorico. Qualitative Aspects of Biogas Production in a Small-Scale Biodigester by Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste from University Environment. Fronteira: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 31–38, 2022. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2022v11i1.p31-38. Disponível em: https://revistas2.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/5589. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2024.