Knowledge Governance: Building a Conceptual Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2019v8i1.p72-92Palabras clave:
Literature Review, Knowledge Governance, Education, Research, InnovationResumen
Esta revisión de la literatura exploratoria es el punto de partida para una revisión de la literatura en profundidad sobre el tema "Gobernanza del Conocimiento". El objetivo de este estudio es obtener un rápido marco sobre la gobernanza del conocimiento; específicamente se pretende identificar los documentos seminales, fucrales y relevantes en este tema. También se pretende saber de los contextos de estos estudios, así como los niveles ontológicos y las activencias a que se refren. Los principales resultados obrados son: a) la identificación de la estructura del tópico, a través de sus artículos seminales y de los más citados (documentos centrales) y b) la construcción de la herramienta estructurada de análisis. Esta herramienta será posteriomente usada para realizar una revisión de la literatira en profundidad que pretende desarrollar un modelo conceptual holístico de la Gobernanza del Conocimiento. Las conclusiones principales se refieren a las pistas para la futura investigación en este tema.
Citas
Antonelli C 2006. The business governance of localized knowledge: An information economics approach for the economics of knowledge. Industry and Innovation, 13(3):227-261.
Antonelli C 2007. Technological knowledge as an essential facility. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17(4):451-471.
Antonelli C 2008. The new economics of the university: A knowledge governance approach. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1):1-22.
Antonelli C 2013. Knowledge Governance: Pecuniary Knowledge Externalities and Total Factor Productivity Growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1):62-70.
Antonelli C 2016. A Schumpeterian growth model: wealth and directed technological change. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3):395-406.
Antonelli C, Amidei FB, Fassio C 2014. The mechanisms of knowledge governance: State owned enterprises and Italian economic growth, 1950-1994. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 31:43-63.
Antonelli C, Calderini M 2008. The governance of knowledge compositeness and technological performance: The case of the automotive industry in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(1):23-41.
Antonelli C, Fassio C 2014. The heterogeneity of knowledge and the academic mode of knowledge governance: Italian evidence in the first part of the 20th century. Science and Public Policy, 41(1):15-28.
Antonelli C, Fassio C 2016. Globalization and the Knowledge-Driven Economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 30(1), 3-14.
Arrow K 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In National Bureau of Economic Research. The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, p. 609-626.
Boschma R 2005. Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1):61-74.
Cao Y, Xiang Y 2013. The impact of knowledge governance on knowledge sharing: The mediating role of the guanxi effect. Chinese Management Studies, 7(1):36-52.
CASP [homepage on the Internet]. CASP Appraisal Checklists. [cited 2018 Apr 02]. Systematic-Review-Checklist. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists.
Charmaz K 2000. Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In NK Denzin, YS Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, London, p. 509-535.
Chen L, Fong PSW 2012. Revealing performance heterogeneity through knowledge management maturity evaluation: A capability-based approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(18):13523-13539.
Chen L, Fong PSW 2013. Visualizing evolution of knowledge management capability in construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(7):839-851.
Costa AP, De Sousa FN, Moreira A, De Souza DN 2017. Research through Design: Qualitative Analysis to Evaluate the Usability. In PA Costa, PL Reis, F Neri de Sousa, A Moreira, D Lamas (Eds.). Computer Supported Qualitative Research. Springer International Publishing, Cham, p. 1-12.
De Sá Freire P, Dandolini GA, De Souza JA, Silva TC, Couto RM 2017. Knowledge Governance (GovC): The State of the Art about the Term. Biblios, 69:21-40.
Diogo S 2015. Same challenges, different processes: perceptions on governance changes in Portuguese and Finnish higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(2):211-225.
Dopfer K, Foster J, Potts J 2004. Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(3):263-279.
Duncan R 2013. Converting community knowledge into catchment nutrient limits: A constructivist analysis of a new zealand collaborative approach to water management. Nature and Culture, 8(2):205-225.
Duriau VJ, Reger RK, Pfarrer MD 2007. A Content Analysis of the Content Analysis Literature in Organization Studies: Research Themes, Data Sources, and Methodological Refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1):5-34.
Fang SC, Yang CW, Hsu WY 2013. Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: The perspective of knowledge governance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6):943-957.
Fong PSW, Chen L 2012. Governance of learning mechanisms: Evidence from construction firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(9):1053-1064.
Fornell C, Larcker DF 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1):39-50.
Foss NJ 2007. The Emerging Knowledge Governance Approach: Challenges and Characteristics. Organization, 14(1):29-52.
Foss NJ 2009. Alternative research strategies in the knowledge movement: From macro bias to micro-foundations and multi-level explanation. Eur Manage Rev, 6(1):16-28.
Foss NJ, Mahoney JT 2010. Exploring Knowledge Governance. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 2(2-3):93-101.
Foss NJ, Michailova S 2009. Knowledge governance: Processes and perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Gallagher M 2001. Modern university governance: A national perspective. In MC House (coord.), P Kinnear (ed.). The idea of a university: Enterprise or academy?. Australian National University, The Australia Institute, Australia, p. 49-57.
Giebels D, De Jonge VN 2014. Making ecosystem-based management effective: Identifying and evaluating empirical approaches to the governance of knowledge. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 16(1):60-76.
Giebels D, Teisman GR 2015. Towards ecosystem-based management for Mainports: A historical analysis of the role of knowledge in the development of the Rotterdam harbor from 1827 to 2008. Ocean and Coastal Management, 108:39-51.
Giebels D, Van Buuren A, Edelenbos J 2015. Using knowledge in a complex decision-making process - Evidence and principles from the Danish Houting project's ecosystem-based management approach. Environmental Science and Policy, 47:53-67.
Giebels D, Van Buuren A, Edelenbos J 2016. Knowledge governance for ecosystem-based management: Understanding its context-dependency. Environmental Science and Policy, 55:424-435.
Grandori A 1997. Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models. Journal of Management & Governance, 1(1):29-47.
Grandori A 2001. Neither hierarchy nor identity: Knowledge-governance mechanisms and the theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(3-4):381-399.
Grandori A, Furnari S 2008. A chemistry of organization: Combinatory analysis and design. Organization Studies, 29(3):459-485.
Husted K, Michailova S, Minbaeva DB, Pedersen T 2012. Knowledge‐sharing hostility and governance mechanisms: an empirical test. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5):754-773.
Kiminami L, Furuzawa S 2013. Knowledge creation through international cooperation in agriculture. Studies in Regional Science, 43(1):79-87.
Krafft J, Ravix JL 2008. Corporate governance and the governance of knowledge: Rethinking the relationship in terms of corporate coherence. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(1):79-95.
Leite D, Miorando BS, Pinho I, Caregnato CE, Lima EGS 2014. Research networks evaluation: indicators of interactive and formative dynamics. Comunicação & Informação, 17(2):23-37.
Leite D, Pinho I 2017. What Is RNPE Evaluation? Does Metrics Mean the Same?. In D Leite, I Pinho. Evaluating Collaboration Networks in Higher Education Research: Drivers of Excellence. Springer International Publishing, Cham, p. 79-102.
Lemmens T 2013. Pharmaceutical Knowledge Governance: A Human Rights Perspective. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 41(1):163-184.
Martín-Castilla JI, Rodríguez-Ruiz Ó 2008. EFQM model: knowledge governance and competitive advantage. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(1):133-156.
Maxwell J 2009. The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/ 9781483348858.
McCann P, Ortega-Argilés R 2015. Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 49(8):1291-1302.
Michailova S, Sidorova E 2011. From group-based work to organisational learning: The role of communication forms and knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 9(1):73-83.
Mittelman JH 2016. Global Governance and Universities: The Power of Ideas and Knowledge. Globalizations, 13(5):608-621.
Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349:g7647.
Müller R, Glückler J, Aubry M, Shao J 2013. Project management knowledge flows in networks of project managers and project management offices: A case study in the pharmaceutical industry. Project Management Journal, 44(2):4-19.
Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S 1998. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2):242-266.
Neri de Souza F, Neri D, Costa AP 2016. Asking questions in the qualitative research context. The Qualitative Report, 21(13):6-18.
Nonaka I 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1):14-37.
Nonaka I, Takeuchi H 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Nonaka I, Toyama R, Konno N 2000. SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1):5-34.
Nonaka I, Von Krogh G, Voelpel S 2006. Organizational knowledge creation theory: evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27(8):1179-1208.
Nooteboom B 2000. Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(1):69-92.
Peltokorpi V, Tsuyuki E 2006. Knowledge governance in a Japanese project-based organization. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 4(1):36-45.
Pemsel S, Müller R 2012. The governance of knowledge in project-based organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 30(8):865-876.
Pemsel S, Müller R, Söderlund J 2016. Knowledge Governance Strategies in Project-based Organizations. Long Range Planning, 49(6):648-660.
Pemsel S, Wiewiora A, Müller R, Aubry M, Brown K 2014. A conceptualization of knowledge governance in project-based organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8):1411-1422.
Pinho I 2012. Governança e gestão do conhecimento científico, no contexto académico: o estado de arte. In D Leite, EGS Lima (Eds.). Conhecimento, avaliação e redes de colaboração. Produção e produtividade na universidade. Editora Sulina, Porto Alegre, Brasil, p. 223-243.
Pinho I 2016. Knowledge Governance and University Research Center. Proceedings of the TAKE Conference - Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy, Aveiro.
Pinho I, Leite D 2014. Doing a literature review using content analysis-Research Networks Review. CIAIQ2014, Badajoz, Espanha,
Pinho I, Pinho C 2014. Linking networks governance and Knowledge Management as support to knowledge valorization. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Management, 3(6):31-45.
Pinho I, Pinho C 2016. Aligning Knowledge Management with Research Knowledge Governance. In JT Martins, A Molnar (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Innovations in Information Retrieval, Analysis, and Management. IGI Global, Pennsylvania, p. 489-504.
Pinho I, Rego A, Cunha MP 2012. Improving knowledge management processes: A hybrid positive approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2):215 - 242.
Santiago R, Carvalho T, Cardoso S 2015. Portuguese academics' perceptions of higher education institutions' governance and management: a generational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8):1471-1484.
Souza FN, Souza DN, Costa AP 2015. Questioning in the Qualitative Research Process How ICT can support this process? CIAIQ2015, 3.
Tadaki M, Sinner J 2014. Measure, model, optimise: Understanding reductionist concepts of value in freshwater governance. Geoforum, 51:140-151.
Torraco R 2005. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples Human Resource Development Review, 4:356-367.
Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P 2003. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3):207-222.
Tsai W, Ghoshal S 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 41(4):464-476.
Vale M, Caldeira J 2007. Proximity and knowledge governance in localized production systems: The footwear industry in the north region of Portugal. European Planning Studies, 15(4):531-548.
Vale M, Caldeira J 2008. Fashion and the governance of knowledge in a traditional industry: The case of the footwear sectoral innovation system in the northern region of portugal. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(1):61-78.
Wang H 2013. A CoPs approach to knowledge governance: A university-industry case study in China. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 7(4):581-601.
Weiner RR 2018. Network Knowledge Governance: Algorithms and Platform Politics. The European Legacy, 23(3):306-310.
Williams C, Lee SH 2009. Resource allocations, knowledge network characteristics and entrepreneurial orientation of multinational corporations. Research Policy, 38(8):1376-1387.
Williamson OE 1981. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3):548-577.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.