Systems Analysis Framework for Selecting Sustainability Assessment Models: A Proposal to Support the Sugarcane Ethanol Case in the State of São Paulo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2018v7i3.p177-213Palabras clave:
Sustainability Evaluation, Bioethanol, System Approach, EnergyResumen
In Brazil, the sugarcane ethanol has presented extent prominence as biofuel. Then, postulating sustainability for this activity is an essential, difficult but important challenge. With the options range of assessment tools available, this research focused on how these complex issues are considered in the selection of valuation models process as well as how these models are chosen and proposed. For the search was conducted a contextual analysis, identified intervention points for the sugarcane ethanol system, identified critical issues involved in the sustainability concept and its assessment, and was ranked attributes for systemic criteria. The research concluded that there hasn´t been an adequate linkage between the analysis models and their selection, harming the operational sustainability and evaluation. So, the analytical and systemic framework proposed for model selection of sustainability assessment, can contribute to the decision-making process and the formulation and / or evaluation of public policies aimed for the sector's sustainability.
Citas
Adamic L, Adar E 2005. How to Search a Social Network. Social Networks 27 (3):187–203.
Allen M 2001. Analysing the Organizational Environment. London: Selected Knowledge. 240 pp.
Atkinson RD 2003. Network Government for the Digital Age. Washington-DC, Progressive Policy Institute.
Bertalanffy LV 1950. The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology. Science 111 (1):23–29.
Binswanger HC 1999. Fazendo a Sustentabilidade Funcionar. In C Cavalcanti. Meio Ambiente, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Políticas Públicas, 2.ed, Cortez, São Paulo.
Block A, Kropp J, Moldenhauer O, Reusswig F, Schellnhuber HJ 1999. Syndromes of Global Change a Qualitative Modelling Approach to Assist Global Environmental Management.Change.
Bossel H 2002. Assessing Viability and Sustainability: A Systems-Based Approach for Deriving Comprehensive Indicator Sets. Ecology and Society 5(2).
Bott E 1976. Família e Rede Social. Livraria Francisco Alves Editora, Rio de Janeiro.
Branco SM 1999. Ecossistêmica: Uma Abordagem Integrada Dos Problemas Do Meio Ambiente. 2.ed. Edgar Blücher, São Paulo.
Brandão DMS, Crema R 1991. O Novo Paradigma Holístico: Ciência, Filosofia, Arte e Mística. 4.ed. Summus, São Paulo.
Buytaert V, Muys B, Devriendt N, Pelkmans L, Kretzschmar JG, Samson R 2011. Towards Integrated Sustainability Assessment for Energetic Use of Biomass: A State of the Art Evaluation of Assessment Tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (8):3918–33.
Cinelli M, Stuart R, Kirwan KC 2014. Analysis of the Potentials of Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Methods to Conduct Sustainability Assessment. Ecological Indicators.
Cundill G, Fabricius C 2009. Monitoring in Adaptive Co-Management: Toward a Learning Based Approach. J Environ Manag.
Eisenack K, Luedeke M, Kropp J 2006. Construction of Archetypes as a Formal Method to Analyze Socialecological Systems. Proceedings of the Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Synthesis Conference, Bali, Indonesia December, 17.
FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) [homepage on the Internet]. Bioen Fapesp. [updated 2013; cited 2013 Aug. 12] Available from: http://www.bioenfapesp.org/.
Faria JH 2012. Dimensões Da Matriz Epistemológica Em Estudos Em Administração: Uma Proposição. In Encontro da ANPAD. ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro.
Fávero LP, Belfiore P, da Silva FL, Chan BL 2009. Análise de Dados: Modelagem Multivariada Para Tomada de Decisões.
Fernandes V 2010. Interdisciplinaridade: A Possibilidade de Reintegração Social e Recuperação da Capacidade de Reflexão Na Ciência. INTERthesis, 65–80.
Fernandes V, Sampaio CAC 2008. Problemática Ambiental Ou Problemática Socioambiental? A Natureza Da Relação Sociedade/Meio Ambiente. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 18:87–94.
Freeman L 2002. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in Sociology of Science. Booksurge, North Charleston.
Gasparatos A, Scolobig A 2012. Choosing the Most Appropriate Sustainability Assessment Tool. Ecological Economics.
Gasparatos A 2010. Embedded Value Systems in Sustainability Assessment Tools and Their Implications. Journal of Environmental Management.
Gasparatos A, El-Haram M, Horner M 2008. A Critical Review of Reductionist Approaches for Assessing the Progress towards Sustainability.Environmental Impact Assessment Review.
Gibson RB, Hassan S, Holtz S, Tansey J, Whitelaw G 2005. Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability Assessment: Criteria and Processes.
Gomes PR, Fernandes V, Maud FF 2012. The political network from ethanol: influence and power in the decision making process. 5 th International Seminar on Environmental Planning and Management Urban Responses for Climate Change Towards Urbenviron Congress. Brasilia, Brazil - October 18 – 20.
Gough C, Castells N, Funtowicz S 1998. Integrated Assessment: An Emerging Methodology for Complex Issues. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3(3):19–29.
Grace W, Pope J 2011. An Integrated Systems Approach to Sustainability Planning, Assessment and Management. In Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment. Puebla.
Hanneman RA 1998. Computer Assisted Theory Building: Modelling Dynamic Social Systems. Sage, California.
Hanneman RA, Riddle M 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Network, 149.
Hjorth P, Bagheri A 2006. Navigating towards Sustainable Development: A System Dynamics Approach. Futures 38(1):74–92.
Latour B 2011. Ciência Em Ação: Como Seguir Cientista e Engenheiros Sociedade Afora. Unesp. 2.ed. Unesp.
Mangoyana RB, Smith TF, Simpson R. 2013. A Systems Approach to Evaluating Sustainability of Biofuel Systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25:371–80.
Marques EC 2006. Redes Sociais e Poder No Estado Brasileiro: Aprendizados a Partir de Políticas Urbanas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 21(60):15–41.
Meadows D 1999. Leverage Points:Places to Intervene in a System. Edited by The Sustainability Institute. Hartland Four Corners, Vermont.
Meadows D 2009. Thinking in Systems – a Primer. Earthscan, London.
Morin E 2010. Ciência Com Consciência. Bertrand Brasil, Rio de Janeiro.
Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Guimarães PMR, Silva JPA, Carneiro LM, Roberto IC, Vicente A, Domingues L, Teixeira JA 2010. Technological Trends, Global Market, and Challenges of Bio-Ethanol Production. Biotechnology Advances 28 (6):817–30.
Olde EM, Eddie AMB, Imke JMB 2017. The Choice of the Sustainability Assessment Tool Matters : Differences in Thematic Scope and Assessment Results. Ecological Economics 136. Elsevier B.V.:77–85. Avaiable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.015.
Pereira MG, Camacho CF, Freitas MAV, da Silva NF 2012. The Renewable Energy Market in Brazil: Current Status and Potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
Pina A, Ferrão P, Fournier J, Lacarrière B, Corre OL 2017. Investment Motivation in Renewable Energy: A PPP Approach, no. 115:229–38.
Portal Brasil [homepage on the Internet]. Governo Federal é Formado Por Ministérios, Secretarias e Órgãos Especiais. [updated 2013; cited 2013 oct. 19] Available from: http://www.brasil.gov.br/ governo/2009/11/governo-federal-e-formado-por-ministerios-secretarias-e-orgaos-especiais.
Ramírez JJE 2002. Síndromes de Sostenibilidad Ambiental Del Desarrollo En Colombia. Serie Semi. Naciones Unidas. Availble from: http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/6760/S0410743_es.pdf? sequence=1.
Resiliance Alliance 2007a. Assessing and Managing Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems : A Practitioners Workbook. Retrieved June 1 (June):87.
Resilience Alliance 2007b. Assessing Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems - A Workbook for Scientists. Transformation 22 (June):1–53.
Rhodes RAW 2009. Policy Network Analysis. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy 2016:1–30.
Ridder WD, Turnpenny J, Nilsson M, Von Raggamby A 2007. A Framework for Tool Selection and Use in Integrated Assessment for Sustainable Development. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 9 (4):423–41.
Romeiro A 2001. Economia Ou Economia Política Da Sustentabilidade. Economia Do Meio Ambiente: Teoria e Prática. Rio de …, no. 102:28.
Sala S, Ciuffo B, Nijkamp P 2015. A Systemic Framework for Sustainability Assessment. Ecological Economics 119. The Authors:314–25.
Schuschny A 2009. Síndromes de Cambio Global y Sostenibilidad. In Taller de Síndromes de Cambio Global y Sostenibilidad e Indicadores Compuestos de Desarrollo. México: Las Naciones Unidas. Avaliable from: http://www.cepal.org/cgi-bin/getprod.asp?xml=/dmaah/noticias/paginas/5/36785/P36785.xml&xsl =/dmaah/tpl/p18f.xsl&base=/dmaah/tpl/top-bottom.xsl.
SCOPE (Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment) 2015. Bioenergy & Sustainability: Bridging the Gaps. Edited by GM Souza, RL Victoria, CA Joly, LM Verdade. Scientific, São Paulo.
Scott J 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. SAGE Publications.
Simon HA 1962. The Architecture of Complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106 (6):467–82.
Solé R, Goodwin B 2000. Signs of Life: How Complexity Pervades Biology. Basic Books, New York.
Souza HJ 2009. Como Se Faz a Análise de Conjuntura. Vozes, Petrópolis.
Stattman SL, Hospes O, Mol APJ 2013. Governing Biofuels in Brazil : A Comparison of Ethanol and Biodiesel Policies. Energy Policy 61:22–30.
Tayra F 2006. Capital Natural e Graus de Sustentabilidade Visões de Mundo e Objetivos Conflitantes. Pensamento & Realidade. Revista Do Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados Em Administração-FEA, 100–118.
Turner RK 2006. Sustainability Auditing and Assessment Challenges. Building Research and Information.
Vasconcellos M 2003. Pensamento Sistêmico. O Novo Paradigma Da Ciência. Papirus Editora, São Paulo.
Wiek A, Binder C, Scholz RW 2006. Functions of Scenarios in Transition Processes. Futures 38(7):740-66.
Allen M 2001. Analysing the Organizational Environment. London: Selected Knowledge. 240 pp.
Atkinson RD 2003. Network Government for the Digital Age. Washington-DC, Progressive Policy Institute.
Bertalanffy LV 1950. The Theory of Open Systems in Physics and Biology. Science 111 (1):23–29.
Binswanger HC 1999. Fazendo a Sustentabilidade Funcionar. In C Cavalcanti. Meio Ambiente, Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Políticas Públicas, 2.ed, Cortez, São Paulo.
Block A, Kropp J, Moldenhauer O, Reusswig F, Schellnhuber HJ 1999. Syndromes of Global Change a Qualitative Modelling Approach to Assist Global Environmental Management.Change.
Bossel H 2002. Assessing Viability and Sustainability: A Systems-Based Approach for Deriving Comprehensive Indicator Sets. Ecology and Society 5(2).
Bott E 1976. Família e Rede Social. Livraria Francisco Alves Editora, Rio de Janeiro.
Branco SM 1999. Ecossistêmica: Uma Abordagem Integrada Dos Problemas Do Meio Ambiente. 2.ed. Edgar Blücher, São Paulo.
Brandão DMS, Crema R 1991. O Novo Paradigma Holístico: Ciência, Filosofia, Arte e Mística. 4.ed. Summus, São Paulo.
Buytaert V, Muys B, Devriendt N, Pelkmans L, Kretzschmar JG, Samson R 2011. Towards Integrated Sustainability Assessment for Energetic Use of Biomass: A State of the Art Evaluation of Assessment Tools. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (8):3918–33.
Cinelli M, Stuart R, Kirwan KC 2014. Analysis of the Potentials of Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Methods to Conduct Sustainability Assessment. Ecological Indicators.
Cundill G, Fabricius C 2009. Monitoring in Adaptive Co-Management: Toward a Learning Based Approach. J Environ Manag.
Eisenack K, Luedeke M, Kropp J 2006. Construction of Archetypes as a Formal Method to Analyze Socialecological Systems. Proceedings of the Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Synthesis Conference, Bali, Indonesia December, 17.
FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo) [homepage on the Internet]. Bioen Fapesp. [updated 2013; cited 2013 Aug. 12] Available from: http://www.bioenfapesp.org/.
Faria JH 2012. Dimensões Da Matriz Epistemológica Em Estudos Em Administração: Uma Proposição. In Encontro da ANPAD. ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro.
Fávero LP, Belfiore P, da Silva FL, Chan BL 2009. Análise de Dados: Modelagem Multivariada Para Tomada de Decisões.
Fernandes V 2010. Interdisciplinaridade: A Possibilidade de Reintegração Social e Recuperação da Capacidade de Reflexão Na Ciência. INTERthesis, 65–80.
Fernandes V, Sampaio CAC 2008. Problemática Ambiental Ou Problemática Socioambiental? A Natureza Da Relação Sociedade/Meio Ambiente. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 18:87–94.
Freeman L 2002. The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in Sociology of Science. Booksurge, North Charleston.
Gasparatos A, Scolobig A 2012. Choosing the Most Appropriate Sustainability Assessment Tool. Ecological Economics.
Gasparatos A 2010. Embedded Value Systems in Sustainability Assessment Tools and Their Implications. Journal of Environmental Management.
Gasparatos A, El-Haram M, Horner M 2008. A Critical Review of Reductionist Approaches for Assessing the Progress towards Sustainability.Environmental Impact Assessment Review.
Gibson RB, Hassan S, Holtz S, Tansey J, Whitelaw G 2005. Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability Assessment: Criteria and Processes.
Gomes PR, Fernandes V, Maud FF 2012. The political network from ethanol: influence and power in the decision making process. 5 th International Seminar on Environmental Planning and Management Urban Responses for Climate Change Towards Urbenviron Congress. Brasilia, Brazil - October 18 – 20.
Gough C, Castells N, Funtowicz S 1998. Integrated Assessment: An Emerging Methodology for Complex Issues. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3(3):19–29.
Grace W, Pope J 2011. An Integrated Systems Approach to Sustainability Planning, Assessment and Management. In Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment. Puebla.
Hanneman RA 1998. Computer Assisted Theory Building: Modelling Dynamic Social Systems. Sage, California.
Hanneman RA, Riddle M 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Network, 149.
Hjorth P, Bagheri A 2006. Navigating towards Sustainable Development: A System Dynamics Approach. Futures 38(1):74–92.
Latour B 2011. Ciência Em Ação: Como Seguir Cientista e Engenheiros Sociedade Afora. Unesp. 2.ed. Unesp.
Mangoyana RB, Smith TF, Simpson R. 2013. A Systems Approach to Evaluating Sustainability of Biofuel Systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25:371–80.
Marques EC 2006. Redes Sociais e Poder No Estado Brasileiro: Aprendizados a Partir de Políticas Urbanas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 21(60):15–41.
Meadows D 1999. Leverage Points:Places to Intervene in a System. Edited by The Sustainability Institute. Hartland Four Corners, Vermont.
Meadows D 2009. Thinking in Systems – a Primer. Earthscan, London.
Morin E 2010. Ciência Com Consciência. Bertrand Brasil, Rio de Janeiro.
Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Guimarães PMR, Silva JPA, Carneiro LM, Roberto IC, Vicente A, Domingues L, Teixeira JA 2010. Technological Trends, Global Market, and Challenges of Bio-Ethanol Production. Biotechnology Advances 28 (6):817–30.
Olde EM, Eddie AMB, Imke JMB 2017. The Choice of the Sustainability Assessment Tool Matters : Differences in Thematic Scope and Assessment Results. Ecological Economics 136. Elsevier B.V.:77–85. Avaiable from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.015.
Pereira MG, Camacho CF, Freitas MAV, da Silva NF 2012. The Renewable Energy Market in Brazil: Current Status and Potential. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
Pina A, Ferrão P, Fournier J, Lacarrière B, Corre OL 2017. Investment Motivation in Renewable Energy: A PPP Approach, no. 115:229–38.
Portal Brasil [homepage on the Internet]. Governo Federal é Formado Por Ministérios, Secretarias e Órgãos Especiais. [updated 2013; cited 2013 oct. 19] Available from: http://www.brasil.gov.br/ governo/2009/11/governo-federal-e-formado-por-ministerios-secretarias-e-orgaos-especiais.
Ramírez JJE 2002. Síndromes de Sostenibilidad Ambiental Del Desarrollo En Colombia. Serie Semi. Naciones Unidas. Availble from: http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/6760/S0410743_es.pdf? sequence=1.
Resiliance Alliance 2007a. Assessing and Managing Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems : A Practitioners Workbook. Retrieved June 1 (June):87.
Resilience Alliance 2007b. Assessing Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems - A Workbook for Scientists. Transformation 22 (June):1–53.
Rhodes RAW 2009. Policy Network Analysis. The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy 2016:1–30.
Ridder WD, Turnpenny J, Nilsson M, Von Raggamby A 2007. A Framework for Tool Selection and Use in Integrated Assessment for Sustainable Development. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 9 (4):423–41.
Romeiro A 2001. Economia Ou Economia Política Da Sustentabilidade. Economia Do Meio Ambiente: Teoria e Prática. Rio de …, no. 102:28.
Sala S, Ciuffo B, Nijkamp P 2015. A Systemic Framework for Sustainability Assessment. Ecological Economics 119. The Authors:314–25.
Schuschny A 2009. Síndromes de Cambio Global y Sostenibilidad. In Taller de Síndromes de Cambio Global y Sostenibilidad e Indicadores Compuestos de Desarrollo. México: Las Naciones Unidas. Avaliable from: http://www.cepal.org/cgi-bin/getprod.asp?xml=/dmaah/noticias/paginas/5/36785/P36785.xml&xsl =/dmaah/tpl/p18f.xsl&base=/dmaah/tpl/top-bottom.xsl.
SCOPE (Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment) 2015. Bioenergy & Sustainability: Bridging the Gaps. Edited by GM Souza, RL Victoria, CA Joly, LM Verdade. Scientific, São Paulo.
Scott J 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. SAGE Publications.
Simon HA 1962. The Architecture of Complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106 (6):467–82.
Solé R, Goodwin B 2000. Signs of Life: How Complexity Pervades Biology. Basic Books, New York.
Souza HJ 2009. Como Se Faz a Análise de Conjuntura. Vozes, Petrópolis.
Stattman SL, Hospes O, Mol APJ 2013. Governing Biofuels in Brazil : A Comparison of Ethanol and Biodiesel Policies. Energy Policy 61:22–30.
Tayra F 2006. Capital Natural e Graus de Sustentabilidade Visões de Mundo e Objetivos Conflitantes. Pensamento & Realidade. Revista Do Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados Em Administração-FEA, 100–118.
Turner RK 2006. Sustainability Auditing and Assessment Challenges. Building Research and Information.
Vasconcellos M 2003. Pensamento Sistêmico. O Novo Paradigma Da Ciência. Papirus Editora, São Paulo.
Wiek A, Binder C, Scholz RW 2006. Functions of Scenarios in Transition Processes. Futures 38(7):740-66.
Descargas
Publicado
2018-12-24
Cómo citar
GOMES, Priscila Rodrigues; FERNANDES, Valdir; MALHEIROS, Tadeu Fabrício. Systems Analysis Framework for Selecting Sustainability Assessment Models: A Proposal to Support the Sugarcane Ethanol Case in the State of São Paulo. Fronteira: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 3, p. 177–213, 2018. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2018v7i3.p177-213. Disponível em: https://revistas2.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/3000. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2024.
Número
Sección
Artigos
Licencia
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional. 
