The Congress Role in the Formulation of National Program for Production and Use of Biodiesel (PNPB)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2014v3i1.p19-39Abstract
This article aims to analyze the parliamentary participation in the formulation of the National Program for Production and Use of Biodiesel. The central argument is that congressmen are proactive and not just reactive to the presidency preferences, they also have skills and abilities to participate in decision-making process and propose alternatives to the design of public policies formulated within the Executive, and thus develop actions and make certain choices with regard to resources, time and attention devoted to the formulation of government public policy activities. The triangulation methodology will allow the observation more accurately of parliamentary involvement in the formulation of the new energy matrix of renewable fuels policy...
Keywords: National Program for Production and Use of Biodiesel; formulation of public policies; Executive-Legislative relationship; parliamentary action; policy networks.References
Alemán, Eduardo. 2009. Partidos Legislativos e Redes de Apoio. In: Rennó, Lucio e Inácio, Magna. Legislativo Brasileiro em Perspectiva Comparada. Editora UFMG.
Bäck, Hanna e Dumont, Patrick. 2003. Tracing as the Next Step of Scientific Advance in Coalition Research. ECPR General Conference in Marburg, 18-21 September.
Bennett, Andrew. 2004. Case Study Methods: Design, Use, and Comparative Advantages. In: Sprinz, Detlef e Wolinsky, Yael. Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. University of Michigan Press.
Bonafont, Laura. 2004. Redes de políticas públicas. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológica. Madrid.
Börzel, Tanja. 1998. Organizing Babylon: On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks. Public Administration, Vol.76, summer, pp. 253-273.
Burt, Ronald. 2004. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349-399.
Cho, Wendy K. Tam and Fowler, James. 2010. Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation. The Journal of Politics, vol.72, No. 1, January, pp-124-135.
Duarte, Mariângela. 2011. Depoimento da ex-deputada federal Mariângela Duarte ao Instituto Volta ao Campo. disponível em: http://institutovoltaaocampo.org.br/depoimentos/leia/16.
Fenno, Richard. 1989. Congressmen and Committees: A Comparative Analysis. In: Mccubbins, Mathew and Sullivan, Terry (ed.). Congress: Strecture and Policy. Cambridge University Press.
Figueiredo, Argelina e Limongi, Fernando. 2009. Poder de agenda e políticas substantivas. In: Rennó, Lúcio e Inácio, Magna. Legislativo brasileiro em perspectiva comparada. Editora UFMG.
Frey, Klaus. 2000. Políticas públicas: um debate conceitual e reflexões referentes à prática da análise de políticas públicas no Brasil. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas (IPEA), Brasília, v. 21, p. 211-259.
George, Alexander e Bennet, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gilmour, Robert and Halley, Alexis. 1994. Co-Managing Policy and Program Development. In: GILMOUR, Robert and HALLEY, Alexis. Who Makes Public Policy?: The Struggle for Control Between Congress and the Executive. Chatham House Publishers.
Granovetter, Mark. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University Press.
Holanda, Ariosto. 2004. O biodiesel e a Inclusão Social. Centro de Documentações e Informações, Câmara dos Deputados.
Inácio, Magna. 2011. Engajamento Parlamentar no Brasil. In: POWER, Timothy e ZUCCO JR, Cesar. O Congresso Por Ele Mesmo. Editora UFMG.
Kettl, Donald. 2002. The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Kickert, Walter J M and Koppenjan, Joop F M. 1997. Public Management and Network Management: An Overview. In: Kickert, Walter J M; Klijn, Erik-Hans and Koppenjan, Joop F M (editores). Managing Complex Networks: strategies for public setor. London: SAGE Publications.
Knoke et al. 1996. Comparing Policy Network: Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Combridge University Press.
Laumann, Edward and Knoke, David. 1987. The Organization State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Wisconsin University Press.
Limongi, Fernando. 1994. O Novo Institucionalismo e Os Estudos Legislativos. A Literatura Norte-Americana Recente. BOLETIM INFORMATIVO BIBLIOGRÁFICO, n.37, p. 3-38.
Lopez, Felix G. 2005. A Política do Espólio dos Deputados Estaduais do Rio de Janeiro: Estudo sobre as Indicações para Cargos de Confiança. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Lowi, Theodor. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies and Polítical Theory. World Politics, 16: 677-715.
Lowi, Theodor. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice”. Public Administration Review, 32: 298-310.
Marques, Eduardo Cesar. 1999. Redes Sociais e Instituições na Construção do Estado e da sua Permeabilidade. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 14, n.41.
Otoni, Rubens. 2005. Projeto de lei n0 526/2003. Câmara dos Deputados.
Otoni, Rubens. Entrevista. Maio de 2011. Brasília. Entrevista Concedida a Pedro Araújo Pietrafesa.
Rhode, David. 2005. Committees and Policy Formulation. In: QUIRK, Paul and Binder, Sarah. The Legislative Branch. Oxford University Press.
Richardson, Jeremy John. & Jordan, Grant. 1979. Governing Under Pressure: British Politics in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy. Oxford, Martin Robertson.
Rodrigues, Rodrigo et al. 2003. Relatório Final do Grupo de Trabalho Interministerial Encarregado de Apresentar Estudos sobre a Viabilidade de Utilização de Óleo Vegetal – Biodiesel como Fonte Alternativa de Energia. Brasília, Casa Civil da Presidência da República.
Rodrigues, Rodrigo. Entrevista. Abril de 2011. Brasília. Entrevista Concedida a Pedro Araújo Pietrafesa.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Weible, Christopher, M. 2007. "The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications". In Paul A. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. 2nd Edition, Westview Press, pp. 189-220.
Sabatier, Paul. 1988. An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Orientated Learning Therein. Policy Sciences, 21: 129-168.
Spiller, Pablo and Tommasi, Mariano. 2004. The Institutions of Regulations. Working Papers, 67, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised, Mar..
Thurber, James. 1996. Political Power and Policy Subsystems in American Politics. In: PETERS, Guy and ROCKMAN, Bert (ed.) Agenda for Excellence: Administering the State (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1996), pp.76-104.
Bäck, Hanna e Dumont, Patrick. 2003. Tracing as the Next Step of Scientific Advance in Coalition Research. ECPR General Conference in Marburg, 18-21 September.
Bennett, Andrew. 2004. Case Study Methods: Design, Use, and Comparative Advantages. In: Sprinz, Detlef e Wolinsky, Yael. Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. University of Michigan Press.
Bonafont, Laura. 2004. Redes de políticas públicas. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológica. Madrid.
Börzel, Tanja. 1998. Organizing Babylon: On the Different Conceptions of Policy Networks. Public Administration, Vol.76, summer, pp. 253-273.
Burt, Ronald. 2004. Structural Holes and Good Ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349-399.
Cho, Wendy K. Tam and Fowler, James. 2010. Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation. The Journal of Politics, vol.72, No. 1, January, pp-124-135.
Duarte, Mariângela. 2011. Depoimento da ex-deputada federal Mariângela Duarte ao Instituto Volta ao Campo. disponível em: http://institutovoltaaocampo.org.br/depoimentos/leia/16.
Fenno, Richard. 1989. Congressmen and Committees: A Comparative Analysis. In: Mccubbins, Mathew and Sullivan, Terry (ed.). Congress: Strecture and Policy. Cambridge University Press.
Figueiredo, Argelina e Limongi, Fernando. 2009. Poder de agenda e políticas substantivas. In: Rennó, Lúcio e Inácio, Magna. Legislativo brasileiro em perspectiva comparada. Editora UFMG.
Frey, Klaus. 2000. Políticas públicas: um debate conceitual e reflexões referentes à prática da análise de políticas públicas no Brasil. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas (IPEA), Brasília, v. 21, p. 211-259.
George, Alexander e Bennet, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gilmour, Robert and Halley, Alexis. 1994. Co-Managing Policy and Program Development. In: GILMOUR, Robert and HALLEY, Alexis. Who Makes Public Policy?: The Struggle for Control Between Congress and the Executive. Chatham House Publishers.
Granovetter, Mark. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University Press.
Holanda, Ariosto. 2004. O biodiesel e a Inclusão Social. Centro de Documentações e Informações, Câmara dos Deputados.
Inácio, Magna. 2011. Engajamento Parlamentar no Brasil. In: POWER, Timothy e ZUCCO JR, Cesar. O Congresso Por Ele Mesmo. Editora UFMG.
Kettl, Donald. 2002. The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Kickert, Walter J M and Koppenjan, Joop F M. 1997. Public Management and Network Management: An Overview. In: Kickert, Walter J M; Klijn, Erik-Hans and Koppenjan, Joop F M (editores). Managing Complex Networks: strategies for public setor. London: SAGE Publications.
Knoke et al. 1996. Comparing Policy Network: Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Combridge University Press.
Laumann, Edward and Knoke, David. 1987. The Organization State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Wisconsin University Press.
Limongi, Fernando. 1994. O Novo Institucionalismo e Os Estudos Legislativos. A Literatura Norte-Americana Recente. BOLETIM INFORMATIVO BIBLIOGRÁFICO, n.37, p. 3-38.
Lopez, Felix G. 2005. A Política do Espólio dos Deputados Estaduais do Rio de Janeiro: Estudo sobre as Indicações para Cargos de Confiança. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Lowi, Theodor. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies and Polítical Theory. World Politics, 16: 677-715.
Lowi, Theodor. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice”. Public Administration Review, 32: 298-310.
Marques, Eduardo Cesar. 1999. Redes Sociais e Instituições na Construção do Estado e da sua Permeabilidade. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 14, n.41.
Otoni, Rubens. 2005. Projeto de lei n0 526/2003. Câmara dos Deputados.
Otoni, Rubens. Entrevista. Maio de 2011. Brasília. Entrevista Concedida a Pedro Araújo Pietrafesa.
Rhode, David. 2005. Committees and Policy Formulation. In: QUIRK, Paul and Binder, Sarah. The Legislative Branch. Oxford University Press.
Richardson, Jeremy John. & Jordan, Grant. 1979. Governing Under Pressure: British Politics in a Post-Parliamentary Democracy. Oxford, Martin Robertson.
Rodrigues, Rodrigo et al. 2003. Relatório Final do Grupo de Trabalho Interministerial Encarregado de Apresentar Estudos sobre a Viabilidade de Utilização de Óleo Vegetal – Biodiesel como Fonte Alternativa de Energia. Brasília, Casa Civil da Presidência da República.
Rodrigues, Rodrigo. Entrevista. Abril de 2011. Brasília. Entrevista Concedida a Pedro Araújo Pietrafesa.
Sabatier, Paul A., and Weible, Christopher, M. 2007. "The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications". In Paul A. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. 2nd Edition, Westview Press, pp. 189-220.
Sabatier, Paul. 1988. An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Orientated Learning Therein. Policy Sciences, 21: 129-168.
Spiller, Pablo and Tommasi, Mariano. 2004. The Institutions of Regulations. Working Papers, 67, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised, Mar..
Thurber, James. 1996. Political Power and Policy Subsystems in American Politics. In: PETERS, Guy and ROCKMAN, Bert (ed.) Agenda for Excellence: Administering the State (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1996), pp.76-104.
Published
2014-06-16
How to Cite
PIETRAFESA, Pedro Araújo; PIETRAFESA, José Paulo. The Congress Role in the Formulation of National Program for Production and Use of Biodiesel (PNPB). Fronteiras - Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 19–39, 2014. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2014v3i1.p19-39. Disponível em: https://revistas2.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/756. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that providing free scientific knowledge to the public, we provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
As of the publication in the journal the authors have copyright and publication rights of their articles without restrictions.
The Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science follows the legal precepts of the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. 
