Indicadores de Carbono en la Industria Farmacéutica: Huella de Carbono vs Huella Ecológica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2022v11i1.p60-75Keywords:
climate change, carbon measurement indicators, ecological footprint, carbon footprint, pharmaceutical industryAbstract
Climate change is among the factors of greatest interest worldwide in the social and business level, the carbon footprint is an indicator that measures the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) that are made in the material production chain, since obtaining raw materials until waste treatment. The ecological footprint is a real measure of the impact caused by human activities on the environment and is determined according to the amount of greenhouse gases produced. The proposal is the measure of the complete ecological footprint to consider the carbon as the base and not only CO2, as used in the tools described. The present research works on the international context and methodologies for carbon measurement and makes a comparative analysis between the carbon footprint and the ecological footprint, its scope, and differences, as well as illustrating its application in the pharmaceutical industry.
References
British Petroleum (BP). 2019. “Climate Change.” Reducing Emissions in Our Operations. 2019. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/sustainability/climate-change/reducing-emissions-in-our-operations.html.
British Standards Institution (BSI). 2011. “ISO, Standards, Certificacion, News.” Newly Revised PAS 2050 Poised to Boost International Efforts to Carbon Footprint Products. 2011. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/about-bsi/media-centre/press-releases/2011/9/NEWLY-REVISED-PAS-2050-POISED-TO-BOOST-INTERNATIONAL-EFFORTS-TO-CARBON-FOOTPRINT-PRODUCTS/.
———. 2018. “PAS 2060 Carbon Neutrality.” Demonstrate Your Carbon Neutrality. 2018. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/PAS-2060-Carbon-Neutrality/.
Carballo Penela, A;, M. C; García-Negro, J. L; Doménech Quesada, C. S; Villasante, G; Rodríguez Rodríguez, and M. García Arenales. 2008. “A Pegada Ecolóxica Corporativa: Concepto e Aplicación a Dúas Empresas Pesqueiras de Galicia.” Revista Galega de Economía 17.
Carbon Trust. 2018. “Carbon Footprinting.” https://www.carbontrust.com/.
Chambers, N;, and K Lewis. 2001. “Ecological Footprint Análisis: Towards a Sustainability Indicador for Business.” ACCA Research Report No.65.
Climate Counts and the Center or Sustainable Organizations. 2013. “Assessing Corporate Emissions Performance through the Lens of Climate Science.” CIRED - Open Access Proceedings Journal. https://www.sustainableorganizations.org/.
Commission of the European Communities. 2008. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions on the Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan.” Bruselas. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0397.
Council of the European Union. 2008. “Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan. Council Conclusions.” Bruselas. https://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST 16914 2008 INIT.
Doménech, J.L. 2004. “Huella Ecológica Portuaria y Desarrollo Sostenible.” Puertos, no. 114: 26–31.
Doménech, Juan Luis, and Mónica G. Arenales. 2008. “La Huella Ecológica de Las Empresas: 4 Años de Seguimiento En El Puerto de Gijón.” Observatorio Iberoamericano Del Desarrollo Local y La Economía Social 1: 21.
Global Footprint Network. 2016. “Ecological Wealth of Nations.” Global Footprint Network. https://www.footprintnetwork.org/.
Global Report Initiative (GRI). 2018. “Towards More and Better Reporting GRI Standards: A Global Common Language for Transparency.” https://www.globalreporting.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/2019/Towards more and better reporting - GRI Annual Report 2018.pdf.
Godoy, Emilio. 2008. “Inter Press Service. Agenda de Noticias.” CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO-AMÉRICA LATINA: Números Que Asustan. 2008. http://www.ipsnoticias.net/2008/11/cambio-climatico-america-latina-numeros-que-asustan/.
Heery, Edmund;, and Mike Noon. 2008. “PEST Analysis.” A Dictionary of Human Resource Management. Oxfor University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199298761.001.0001/acref-9780199298761-e-936.
Holland, Leigh. 2003. “Can the Principle of the Ecological Footprint Be Applied to Measure the Environmental Sustainability of Business?” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10: 224–32.
ICF International Inc. 2018. “Work ICF.” Climate Action and Resilience. 2018. https://www.icf.com/work/climate.
Kitzes, J., A. Peller, S. Goldfinger, and M. Wackernagel. 2007. “Currents Methods for Calculating National Ecological Footprint Accounts.” Science for Environment & Sustainable Society 41: 1–9.
Lenzen, M; Foran, B; Dey, C. 2006. “Sustainability Accounting for Business-A New International Software Based on Input-Output Tables.” In Intermediate Input-Output Meeting Conference, 26–28 July Sendai, Japan.
Lenzen, Manfred; Lundie, Sven; Bransgrove, Grant; Charet, Lisa; Sack, Fabian. 2003. “Assessing the Ecological Footprint of a Large Metropolitan Water Supplier: Lessons for Water Management and Planning towards Sustainability.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46: 113–41.
Lin, David, Laurel Hanscom, Adeline Murthy, Alessandro Galli, Mikel Evans, Evan Neill, Maria Mancini, et al. 2018. “Ecological Footprint Accounting for Countries: Updates and Results of the National Footprint Accounts, 2012–2018.” Resources 7 (3): 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7030058.
Monfreda, C., M. Wackernagel, and D. Deumling. 2004. “Establishing National Natural Capital Accounts Based on DetailedEcological Footprint and Biological Capacity Assessments.” Land Use Policy 21: 231–46.
Murray, J; Dey, M. 2007. “Assessing the Impacts of a Loaf of Bread.”
Penela, Adolfo Carballo, María Do Carme García Negro, Juan Luis Doménech Quesada, Carlos Sebastián Villasante, Gonzalo Rodríguez Rodríguez, and Mónica González Arenáles. 2008. “La Huella Ecológica Corporativa: Concepto y Aplicacion a Dos Empresas Pesqueras de Galicia.” Revista Galega de Economia 17 (2).
Rees, William E. 1992. “Ecological Footprints and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: What Urban Economics Leaves Out.” Environment and Urbanization 4 (2): 121–30.
Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. 2012. Huella Ecológica, Datos y Rostros. Centro de.
Wackernagel, M; Rees, W. E. 1996. “Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth.” New Society Publishers. Philadelphia, USA.
Wackernagel, M;, and J. Silverstein. 2000. “Big Things First: Focusing on the Scale Imperative with the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Economics.” Ecological Economics 32: 391–94.
Wackernagel, M., N. Schulz, D. Deumling, A. Callejas Linares, M. Jenkins, V. Kapos, C. Monfreda, et al. 2002. “Tracking the Ecological Overshoot of the Human Economy.” In National Academy of Science 99, 9266–71.
Wackernagel, Mathis;, and J. David Yount. 2000. “Footprints for Sustainability: The Next Steps.” Environment, Development and Sustainability 2: 23–44.
Wackernagel, Mathis. 1994. “Ecological Footprint and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: A Tool for Planning toward Sustainability.” The Swiss Federal Insitute of Technology, Zúrich, 1988.
———. 1998. “The Ecological Footprint of Santiago de Chile.” Local Environment 3: 7–25.
Wiedmann, Thomas; Lenzen, Manfred. 2006. “Sharing Responsibility along Supply Chains - A New Life-Cycle Approach and Software Tool for Triple-Bottom-Line Accounting.” In Working Paper Presented at the Corporate Responsibility Research Conference, 4–5.
Wiedmann, T., J. Barret, and M. Lenzen. 2007. “Companies on the Scale: Comparing and Benchmarking the Footprints of Businesses.” In Working Paper Presented at the International Ecological Footprint Conference.
Wiedmann, T., and M. Lenzen. 2007. “Unravelling the Impacts of Supply Chains. A New Triple-Bottom-Line Accounting Approach. ISA UK Research Report.”
Wiedmann, T., and J. Minx. 2007. “A Definition of Carbon Footprint. ISA UK Research Report.” Durhan, U.K.
World Resources Institute;, and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2019. “Greenhouse Gas Protocol.” Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard. 2019. https://ghgprotocol.org/standards/scope-3-standard.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that providing free scientific knowledge to the public, we provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
As of the publication in the journal the authors have copyright and publication rights of their articles without restrictions.
The Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science follows the legal precepts of the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.