Challenges of University Governance: Notes on Matters of Authority and the Professionalization of University Manangement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2019v8i3.p435-456Keywords:
University, Higher Education, University Governance, University AuthorityAbstract
Latinamerican univeristies, as complex organizations by excellence, are going through a minefield of challenges that are well worth unveiling. Generally speaking, the enviroment in which universities operate, cohabit a great number of decition makers and advocates of public policies, whom most of the time, lack of the mínimum technical competences or the professional requirements; which is extremely dangerous for such an estrategic role that plays the sector in countries’ progress and developement. The present paper has proposed itself to reflecto on the matters of autority and profesionalization of management within universities, as one of the primary challenges of university governance. With this in mind, a theoretical investigation, supported by reviewing and sistematizing academic literature on the specific subject was used as resort, and contributions of Burton Clark were taken as main reference. Among the most relevant conclusions, it is factible to affirm that the challenges that university governance faces to overcome what Clark calls the inertia state of traditional universities, it stans out: to develop network contacts between leaders to create a culture oriented to change; to adminístrate in a innovatite way, based on skills, leadership, flexibility, permanent contextualization, capacity to produce and manage changes; to demand different postures oriented to profesionalization from education managers, excecutives and technician, overall, an administration with new techniques and management methods.
References
ARWU (Academic Ranking of World University) 2018. Academic Ranking of World Universities. [Consultado 4 jun. 2019]. Disponible en: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2018.html.
Banco Mundial 2017. Momento decisivo La Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe. Direcciones en Desarrollo. Desarrollo Humano. Banco Internacional de Reconstrucción y Fomento/Banco Mundial, Washington DC.
Brunner JJ 2011. Gobernanza universitaria: tipología, dinámicas y tendencias. Revista de Educación, 355(2):137-159.
Brunner JJ, Ganga-Contreras FA 2016. Dinámicas de transformación en la Educación Superior latinoamericana: Desafíos para la gobernanza. Revista Opción, 32(80):12-35.
Brunner JJ, Ganga-Contreras FA, Rodríguez-Ponce E 2018. Gobernanza del Capitalismo Académico: Aproximaciones desde Chile. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 23(1):11-35.
Calderón AI 2000. Universidades mercantis: a institucionalização do mercado universitário em questão. São Paulo em Perspectiva (Impresso), 14(1):61-72.
Calderón AI, França CM 2018. Rankings acadêmicos na educação superior: tendências da literatura ibero-americana. Avaliação: Revista da avaliação da educação superior, 23(2):448-466.
Clark B 1983. El sistema de Educación Superior. Una visión comparativa de la organización académica. Nueva Visión. México.
Clark B 2006. Em busca da universidade empreendedora. In: JLN Audy, MC Morosini (comp.). Inovação e Empreendedorismo na Universidade. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre, p. 15-41.
Clark B 2015. The character of the entrepreneurial university. International Higher Education, 38: 2-3.
Colombo SS 2013. Gestão Universitária: Os Caminhos para a Excelência. Ed. Penso, Porto Alegre.
CRES (Conferencia Regional de la Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe) 2008. Declaraciones y plan de acción. UNESCO – IESALC, Cartagena.
CRES (Conferencia Regional de la Educación Superior en América Latina y el Caribe) 2018. Tendencias de las Educación Superior en América Latina. Coordinador Pedro Henríquez Guajardo. UNESCO – IESALC/Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Caracas/Córdoba.
Cunha LA 1999. A universidade brasileira Entre o taylorismo e a Anarquia. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 10: 90-96.
Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Healey P 1998. Capitalizing knowledge: New intersections of industry and academia. State University of New York Press, United state of America.
Fleck CF, Pereira BAD 2011. Professores e gestores: análise do perfil das competências gerenciais dos coordenadores de pós-graduação das Instituições Federais de Ensino Superior (IFES) do RS, Brasil. Organizações e Sociedade, 18(57): 285-301.
Ganga-Contreras FA 2017. El flipper burocrático en las universidades. Interciencia, 42(1): 58-62.
Ganga-Contreras FA, Quiroz J, Fossatti P 2017. A synchronic analysis of university governance: a theoretical view of the sixties and seventies. Educ. Pesqui., 43(2): 553-568. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ep/2016nahead/1517-9702-ep-S1517-9702201608135289.pdf.
Ganga-Contreras FA, Saez W, Rodriguez-Ponce E, Calderon A, Wandercil M 2018. Universidades públicas de Chile y su desempeño en los rankings académicos Nacionales. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 7(3): 316-341. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2018v7i3.p316-341.
Gomes AM 2003. Estado, Mercado e Educação Superior no Brasil: Um Modelo Analítico. Educação e Sociedade, 24(84): 839-872.
Gonçalves A, Calderón AI 2017. Academic rankings in higher education: trends of international scientific literature. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 17(54):1125-1145.
Ibarra-Colado E 2003. La universidad en México hoy: gubernamentalidad y modernización. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Unión de Universidades de América Latina, México.
Jessop B 2017. Varieties of academic capitalism and entrepreneurial universities. Higher Education, 73(6):853-870. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0120-6.
Klein K, Pizzio A, Rodrigues W 2018. Governança Universitária e Custos de Transação nas Universidades da Amazônia Legal Brasileira. Educação e Sociedade, 39(143):455-474.
Lourenço HS, Calderón AI 2015. Rankings acadêmicos na educação superior: mapeamento da sua expansão no espaço ibero-americano. Acta Scientiarum. Education (Online), 37(2):187-197. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5094639.
Marback G 2005. A gestão do ensino superior em xeque. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 5(16): 281-292.
Martins GM 2007. Um recurso estratégico para a gestão das organizações universitárias. Estudos Revista da Associação Brasileira de Mantenedoras de Ensino Superior, 25(37):.
Meyer Junior V 2000. Novo contexto e as habilidades do Administrador Universitário. In: V Meyer Junior, JP Murphy (orgs.) Dinossauros, gazelas & tigres: um diálogo Brasil e EUA. Insular, Florianópolis.
Mintzberg H, Bruve A, Lampel J 2010. Safari a la estrategia. Una visita guiada por la jungla del management estratégico. Editorial Granica, Argentina.
Mintzberg H, Quinn JB 1993. El proceso estratégico. Conceptos, contextos y casos. 2.ed. Prentice Hall, México.
Naidorf J (comp.) 2011. Los câmbios en la cultura acadêmica de la universidad publica. Editorial universitaria de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires.
OCDE 2008. Tertiary Education for the Knowledge Society. Summary in English. Disponible en: http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/41314497.pdf.
OCDE 2019. Trends shaping education. OCDE Publishing, Paris. Disponible en: http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/41314497.pdf.
Parra-Sandoval MC, Fucci M, Romero A 2019. La Inserción de la Universidad del Zulia en el Proceso de Internacionalización de la Educación Superior. Revista Internacional de Educación Superior, 5:019028. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.20396/riesup.v5i0.8653898.
Rama C 2006. La Tercera Reforma de la Educación Superior en América Latina. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Buenos Aires, 240 pp.
Rama C 2015. La universidad sin fronteras: la internacionalización de le Educación Superior de América Latina. Universidad Ricardo Palma, Perú. Disponible en: http://132.248.235.172/handle/Rep-UDUAL/62.
RICYT (Red de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología-Iberoamericana e Interamericana) 2019. El estado de la ciencia. Principales Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Iberoamericanos / Interamericanos. RICYT, Argentina.
Salmi J 2009. El desafío de crear universidades de rango mundial. Banco Mundial en coedición con Mayol Ediciones S.A, Colombia.
Schmal R, Cabrales F 2018. El desafío de la gobernanza universitaria: el caso chileno. Ensaio: aval. pol. públ. Educ., Rio de Janeiro, 26(100):822-848. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362018002601309.
SCIMAGO 2018. Scimago Ins-titutions Rankings 2018. Disponible en: http://www.scimagoir.com/rankings.php.
Slaughter S, Leslie LL 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimor, 276 pp.
THE (Times Higher Education World) 2019. University Rankings. World University Rankings 2019. [acesso 04 jun. 2019]. Disponible en: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/ 2019/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats.
Tünnermann C 2011. La Educación Superior frente a los desafíos contemporáneos. Lección Inaugural del Año Académico 2011. Universidad Centroamericana Managua, Nicaragua. Disponible en: https://www.unl.edu.ar/iberoextension/dvd/archivos/panelistas/ponencia_carlos_tunnermann_berheim.pdf.
UNESCO 2015. Informe de la UNESCO sobre la Ciencia hacia 2030. Ediciones UNESCO, Reino Unido.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that providing free scientific knowledge to the public, we provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
As of the publication in the journal the authors have copyright and publication rights of their articles without restrictions.
The Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science follows the legal precepts of the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.