Connectedness to Nature and Bird Sounds in Children: A Rural-Urban Comparison in the Child Population of Central Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2024v13i4.p104-117Palavras-chave:
connectedness to nature, emotions, birds, sounds, childrenResumo
Connectedness to Nature (CTN) can be studied from a cognitive, emotional and behavioral perspective as it is formed by the union of these three aspects. Furthermore, CTN is known to have implications for health, well-being, and behavior. Likewise, the presence and sounds of birds are known to be related to CTN. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between CTN and bird sounds in a child population from a rural and urban area in central Mexico. In this study, questionnaires were conducted with 500 children from a rural and an urban area in central Mexico using recordings of bird sounds and quantifying CTN, emotions and memories and associations. Some differences were found between the rural and urban population. It is suggested that the rural population could have a higher CTN and therefore, could feeling happier.
Referências
Bradley M & Lang P 1994. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59.
Buxton R, Pearson A, Allo C, Fristrup K & Wittemyer G 2021. A synthesis of health benefits of natural sounds and their distribution in national parks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(14), e2013097118.
Bynion T & Feldner MT 2017. Self-assessment manikin. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 4654-4656.
Camacho-Guzmán A, Ávila Akerberg VD, Martínez-Soto J, Rodríguez-Soto C, Román Reyes RP 2023. Connectedness to Nature, Well-Being and Presence of Birds. Fronteiras, 12(1), 248-264.
Capaldi CA, Dopko RL & Zelenski JM 2014. The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 976.
Colléony A, White R & Shwartz A 2019. The influence of spending time outside on experience of nature and environmental attitudes. Landscape and urban planning, 187, 96-104.
Colléony A, Cohen-Seffer R & Shwartz A 2020. Unpacking the causes and consequences of the extinction of experience. Biological Conservation, 251, 108788.
Cox DT, Gaston, KJ 2016. Urban bird feeding: connecting people with nature. PloS one 11(7):1-13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158717.
Dushkova D, Ignatieva M, Hughes M, Konstantinova A, Vasenev V, Dovletyarova E 2021 Human Dimensions of Urban Blue and Green Infrastructure during a Pandemic. Case Study of Moscow (Russia) and Perth (Australia). Sustainability, 13, 4148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084148
Ferraro DM, Miller ZD, Ferguson LA, Taff BD, Barber JR, Newman P & Francis CD 2020. The phantom chorus: Birdsong boosts human well-being in protected areas. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287 (1941), 20201811.
Frankel S, Sellmann-Risse D & Basten M 2019. Fourth graders’ connectedness to nature-Does cultural background matter?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101347.
García CH, Corral-Verdugo V & Benavides G 2015. Preference for trees, optimism and physical, psychological and social wellbeing among highschool students/Preferencia hacia el árbol, optimismo y bienestar físico, psicológico y social en estudiantes. Psyecology, 6(2), 213-228.
Hammond RL 2020. Bird feeders increase connection to nature in parents but not in their children. Ecopsychology 12(1):44-53. doi: 10.1089/eco.2019.0036.
Jo H, Song C, Ikei H, Enomoto S, Kobayashi H & Miyazaki Y 2019. Physiological and psychological effects of forest and urban sounds using high-resolution sound sources. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), 2649.
Keil A & Miskovic V 2015. Human emotions: A conceptual overview. Sleep and Affect, 23-44.
Larson LR, Szczytko R, Bowers EP, Stephens LE, Stevenson KT & Floyd MF 2019. Outdoor time, screen time, and connection to nature: troubling trends among rural youth?. Environment and Behavior, 51(8), 966-991.
Lecic-Tosevski D 2019. Is urban living good for mental health?.Current opinion in psychiatry, 32(3), 204-209.
Luo J, Wang M & Chen L 2021. The effects of using a nature-sound mobile application on psychological well-being and cognitive performance among university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 699908.
Mayer FS & Frantz CM 2004. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(4), 503-515.
Martin L, White MP, Hunt A, Richardson M, Pahl S & Burt J 2020. Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of environmental psychology, 68, 101389.
McManis MH, Bradley MM, Berg WK, Cuthbert BN & Lang PJ 2001. Emotional reactions in children: Verbal, physiological, and behavioral responses to affective pictures. Psychophysiology, 38(2), 222-231.
Methorst J, Rehdanz K, Mueller T, Hansjürgens B, Bonn A & Böhning-Gaese K 2021. The importance of species diversity for human well-being in Europe. Ecological Economics, 181, 106917.
Michels N & Hamers P 2023. Nature Sounds for Stress Recovery and Healthy Eating: A Lab Experiment Differentiating Water and Bird Sound. Environment and Behavior, 00139165231174622.
Molinario E, Lorenzi C, Bartoccioni F, Perucchini P, Bobeth S, Colléony A,.... & Bonaiuto M 2020. From childhood nature experiences to adult pro-environmental behaviors: An explanatory model of sustainable food consumption. Environmental Education Research, 26(8), 1137-1163.
Mustapa ND, Maliki NZ, Aziz NF & Hamzah A 2019. Children’s direct and indirect experiences with nature and their connectedness to nature. Planning Malaysia, 17.
Mynott J 2009. Birdscapes: Birds in our imagination and experience. Princeton University Press.
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM & Murphy SA 2009. The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and behavior, 41(5), 715-740.
Nisbet EK, Shaw DW & Lachance DG 2020. Connectedness with nearby nature and well-being. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2, 18.
Okkels N, Kristiansen CB, Munk-Jørgensen P & Sartorius N 2018. Urban mental health: challenges and perspectives. Current opinion in psychiatry, 31(3), 258-264.
Otzen T & Manterola C 2017. Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio. International journal of morphology, 35(1), 227-232.
Posner J, Russell JA & Peterson BS 2005. The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and psychopathology, 17(3), 715-734.
Prieto PF, Arrieta NRG & Flores JPO 2017. Urbanismo e infancia: hacia un modelo de ciudad que promueva la conciencia ambiental. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, (136), 79-94.
Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B & Sowden PT 2016. Associations with bird sounds: How do they relate to perceived restorative potential?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 136-144.
Ratcliffe E, Gatersleben B & Sowden PT 2020. Predicting the perceived restorative potential of bird sounds through acoustics and aesthetics. Environment and Behavior, 52(4), 371-400.
Rosa CD, Profice CC & Collado S 2018. Nature experiences and adults’ self-reported pro- environmental behaviors: the role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in psychology, 9,(1055). 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055
Schultz PW 2002. Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. Psychology of sustainable development (pp.61-78). Springer, Boston, MA
Shu S & Ma H 2020. Restorative effects of urban park soundscapes on children’s psychophysiological stress. Applied Acoustics, 164, 107293.
Subirana-Malaret M, Miró A, Camacho A, Gesse A & McEwan K 2023. A Multi-Country Study Assessing the Mechanisms of Natural Elements and Sociodemographics behind the Impact of Forest Bathing on Well-Being. Forests, 14(5), 904.
Tortello C & Becerra P 2017. ¿Cómo se estudian las emociones en los niños. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología Panamerican Journal of Neuropsychology, 2-20.
Uebel K, Marselle M, Dean AJ, Rhodes JR & Bonn A 2021. Urban green space soundscapes and their perceived restorativeness. People and Nature, 3(3), 756-769.
United Nations 2020. World Cities Report. The value of sustainable urbanization.
Whitburn J, Linklater W & Abrahamse W. 2019. Meta‐analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conservation Biology, 34(1), 180-193.
WHO World Health Organization 2022. Media brief on safelistening.
Zelenski JM, Dopko RL & Capaldi CA 2015. Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of environmental psychology, 42, 24-31.
Zelenski JM & Nisbet EK 2014. Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and behavior, 46(1), 3-23.
Zhao J, Xu W & Ye L 2018. Effects of auditory-visual combinations on perceived restorative potential of urban green space. Applied Acoustics, 141, 169-177.
Zhu X, Gao M, Zhao W & Ge T 2020. Does the presence of birdsongs improve perceived levels of mental restoration from park use? Experiments on parkways of Harbin Sun Island in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2271.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Aracely Camacho-Guzmán, Víctor D. Ávila Akerberg, Joel Martínez-Soto
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional. 
