La Producción Científica de Alto Impacto en Humanidades en Iberoamérica: Un Mapeo Sistemático
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2021v10i3.p266-279Keywords:
humanities, systematic mapping, scientific production, IberoamericaAbstract
Humanities research does not seem to receive the same importance that is given to research in the areas of science and technology. The main purpose of this study is to characterize the production of scientific articles on Humanities during the last five years in Iberoamerica. The methodology used corresponds to the systematic mapping of scientific production. Likewise, from the qualitative paradigm, the themes that are addressed in the different scientific articles resulting from the process have been analyzed, which not only allows us to clarify figures but also to know what the trend of the discussion points is. The webQDA software was used for data analysis. The results of the systematic mapping analysis show that the concept of humanities has been the most referred to be followed by research. The Iberoamerican countries that have production of scientific articles are Spain, Brazil, Chile, and Colombia and the highest percentage of publication was in 2018. Concerning the impact index of the journals, there is a minimum of publications in Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4. Besides the geographical areas with articles cited are Spain, Brazil, Chile, and Colombia. Regarding sex, it is seen that there is an equitable production in the publication of articles by women and men.
References
Ayala-Pérez T 2019. Algunas Consideraciones sobre las Humanidades desde la Era Digital. Universum (Talca), 34(1): 39–64. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-23762019000100039
Cañibano C, Vilardell I, Corona C, Benito-Amat C 2018. The evaluation of research excellence and the dynamics of knowledge production in the humanities: The case of History in Spain. Science and Public Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy025
Castro-Azuara M, Sánchez Camargo M 2016. The training of researchers in the area of Humanities: The challenges of the construction of the voice as author in the writing of the doctoral thesis [La formación de investigadores en el área de humanidades: Los retos de la construcción de la voz autoral en la escritura de la tesis de doctorado]. Revista Signos, (49):30-51
Costa A 2016. Cloud Computing em Investigação Qualitativa: Investigação Colaborativa através do software webQDA. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 5(2): 153-161. https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2016v5i2.p153-161
Cuellar-Villalobos M, Berna M, Quintero P 2016. Cultivar la empatía a través de las humanidades: reflexión sobre una experiencia pedagógica en el aula universitaria. Quaestiones Disputatae: Temas En Debate, 9(19): 161-179. Recuperado a partir de http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/qdisputatae/article/view/1115
Das K, Paital B 2021. Future call for policy making to speed up interdisciplinarity between natural and social sciences and humanities in countries such as India. Heliyon 7, e06484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06484
Fahler V, Colombo V, Navarro F 2019. In search of a disciplinary voice: Intertextuality in humanities’ undergraduate academic writing. Calidoscopio, 17(3), 554–574. https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2019.173.08
Galina-Russell I 2016. The evaluation of digital resources for the humanities [La evaluación de los recursos digitales para las humanidades]. Signa, (25): .121-136.
Gil M 2016. The cultivation of humanities and emotions reflections on moral and political education [El cultivo de las Humanidades y las emociones: Reflexiones en torno a la educación moral y política]. Pensamiento, 72(274):1141-1156.
Golub K, Tyrkkö J, Hansson J., Ahlström I 2020. Subject indexing in humanities: a comparison between a local university repository and an international bibliographic service. Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2019-0231
González de Ávila M 2018. Humanidades y ciencias: levantar la denegación. Arbor, 194(790: 476. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2018.790n4001
González-Fernández R 2018. Market, Humanities And Education: An Analysis From Social Ontology. Revista de Filosofía, (74): 73–90.
Gutiérrez-Rojas M 2016. Jóvenes, literatura y derechos humanos: Una experiencia en las aulas de Humanidades. Revista humanidades, 6(2):1-31. doi: dx.doi.org/10.15517/h.v6i2.26749
Kitchenham B, Charters S 2007. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Versión 2.3.
Martínez-Val J, Arroyo-Almaraz I, García-García F 2018. The relevance of the concept of hysteresis in humanities. Arbor, 194(788). https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2018.788n2010
Meza P, Nascimiento A 2019. La constatación del vacío de investigación en Humanidades: su variación en tesis y artículos de investigación. Alpha: Revista de Artes, Letras y Filosofía, (47): 211–233. https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-220120180004700177
Opazo Ú, 2018. Action, mise-en-scÈne, Event or audiovisual construction? A brief introduction to the concept of performance in humanities and music [¿Acción, puesta en escena, evento o construcción audiovisual? Una breve introducción al concepto de performance en humanidades y en música]. Cuadernos de Música, Artes Visuales y Artes Escénicas, 13(1):.207-231.
Pajić D, Jevremov T, Škorić M 2019. Publication and Citation Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A National Perspective. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 44(1): 67–94.doi:10.29173/cjs
Parente D 2020. El giro posthumanista en las humanidades y sus implicaciones para la filosofía de la técnica. Isegoría, (63): 329–348. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2020.063.03
Petersen K, Vakkalanka S, Kuzniarz L 2015. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, (64):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007
Rubio R, Rodríguez P 2020. ¿Un nuevo a priori histórico? Análisis de propuestas de renovación de las Humanidades centradas en la noción de información. Co-Herencia, 17(33): 167-196. https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.33.6
Sánchez C 2020. Condiciones políticas de la universidad y las nuevas humanidades. Itinerarios latinoamericanos reformistas y contrarreformistas. Atenea, (522): 21-37. https://doi.org/10.29393/At522-94CPCS10094
Sánchez-Gómez M C, García A 2018. Convergence Between Quantitative and Qualitative Methodological Orientations: Mixed Models. En A. P. Costa, L. P. Reis, F. N. de Souza, & A. Moreira (Eds.), Computer Supported Qualitative Research. 341-357. Springer International Publishing.
Sarmento C 2018. Interculturalism and multiculturalism inthe humanities: Between politics and science [Interculturalidade e multiculturalidade nas humanidades: Entre política e ciência]. Estudos Ibero-Americanos, 44(2):.380-392.
Tejada-Artigas C, Giménez-Toledo E, Oliveira A 2020. El prestigio de las editoriales académicas con libros en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades en Brasil. Transinformação, 32, e190043. .https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202032e190043
Torres Perdigón A 2016. ¿Qué papel juegan las humanidades en la lectura y la escritura universitarias? Martha Nussbaum y François Rastier [What's the role of humanities in academic reading and writing processes? Martha Nussbaum and Francois Rastier]. Ikala, 21(3):.313-323
Turin R 2018. Between the disciplinary past and the practical past: Figurations of the historian in the crisis of the humanities. Tempo (Brazil), 24(2): 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1590/tem-1980-542x2018v240201
Verdugo-Castro S, Sánchez-Gómez M C, García-Holgado A, Costa A 2019. Mixed methods and visual representation of data with CAQDAS: empirical study. En M. Á. Conde-González, F. J. Rodríguez Sedano, C. Fernández Llamas, & F.J. García-Peñalvo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2019) (León, Spain, October 16-18, 2019). 511-517. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362847
Weichselbraun A, Kuntschik P, Francolino V, Saner M, Dahinden U, Wyss V 2021. Adapting Data-Driven Research to the Fields of Social Sciences and the Humanities. Future Internet 2021, 13, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13030059
Wolhuter C 2021. Die opstuwende geesteswetenskappe-inskrywings aan Hoëronderwysinstellings wêreldwyd. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, 61(1): 367-382. https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2021/v61n1a21
Cañibano C, Vilardell I, Corona C, Benito-Amat C 2018. The evaluation of research excellence and the dynamics of knowledge production in the humanities: The case of History in Spain. Science and Public Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy025
Castro-Azuara M, Sánchez Camargo M 2016. The training of researchers in the area of Humanities: The challenges of the construction of the voice as author in the writing of the doctoral thesis [La formación de investigadores en el área de humanidades: Los retos de la construcción de la voz autoral en la escritura de la tesis de doctorado]. Revista Signos, (49):30-51
Costa A 2016. Cloud Computing em Investigação Qualitativa: Investigação Colaborativa através do software webQDA. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, 5(2): 153-161. https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2016v5i2.p153-161
Cuellar-Villalobos M, Berna M, Quintero P 2016. Cultivar la empatía a través de las humanidades: reflexión sobre una experiencia pedagógica en el aula universitaria. Quaestiones Disputatae: Temas En Debate, 9(19): 161-179. Recuperado a partir de http://revistas.ustatunja.edu.co/index.php/qdisputatae/article/view/1115
Das K, Paital B 2021. Future call for policy making to speed up interdisciplinarity between natural and social sciences and humanities in countries such as India. Heliyon 7, e06484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06484
Fahler V, Colombo V, Navarro F 2019. In search of a disciplinary voice: Intertextuality in humanities’ undergraduate academic writing. Calidoscopio, 17(3), 554–574. https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2019.173.08
Galina-Russell I 2016. The evaluation of digital resources for the humanities [La evaluación de los recursos digitales para las humanidades]. Signa, (25): .121-136.
Gil M 2016. The cultivation of humanities and emotions reflections on moral and political education [El cultivo de las Humanidades y las emociones: Reflexiones en torno a la educación moral y política]. Pensamiento, 72(274):1141-1156.
Golub K, Tyrkkö J, Hansson J., Ahlström I 2020. Subject indexing in humanities: a comparison between a local university repository and an international bibliographic service. Journal of Documentation. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2019-0231
González de Ávila M 2018. Humanidades y ciencias: levantar la denegación. Arbor, 194(790: 476. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2018.790n4001
González-Fernández R 2018. Market, Humanities And Education: An Analysis From Social Ontology. Revista de Filosofía, (74): 73–90.
Gutiérrez-Rojas M 2016. Jóvenes, literatura y derechos humanos: Una experiencia en las aulas de Humanidades. Revista humanidades, 6(2):1-31. doi: dx.doi.org/10.15517/h.v6i2.26749
Kitchenham B, Charters S 2007. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Versión 2.3.
Martínez-Val J, Arroyo-Almaraz I, García-García F 2018. The relevance of the concept of hysteresis in humanities. Arbor, 194(788). https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2018.788n2010
Meza P, Nascimiento A 2019. La constatación del vacío de investigación en Humanidades: su variación en tesis y artículos de investigación. Alpha: Revista de Artes, Letras y Filosofía, (47): 211–233. https://doi.org/10.32735/s0718-220120180004700177
Opazo Ú, 2018. Action, mise-en-scÈne, Event or audiovisual construction? A brief introduction to the concept of performance in humanities and music [¿Acción, puesta en escena, evento o construcción audiovisual? Una breve introducción al concepto de performance en humanidades y en música]. Cuadernos de Música, Artes Visuales y Artes Escénicas, 13(1):.207-231.
Pajić D, Jevremov T, Škorić M 2019. Publication and Citation Patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities: A National Perspective. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 44(1): 67–94.doi:10.29173/cjs
Parente D 2020. El giro posthumanista en las humanidades y sus implicaciones para la filosofía de la técnica. Isegoría, (63): 329–348. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2020.063.03
Petersen K, Vakkalanka S, Kuzniarz L 2015. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, (64):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007
Rubio R, Rodríguez P 2020. ¿Un nuevo a priori histórico? Análisis de propuestas de renovación de las Humanidades centradas en la noción de información. Co-Herencia, 17(33): 167-196. https://doi.org/10.17230/co-herencia.17.33.6
Sánchez C 2020. Condiciones políticas de la universidad y las nuevas humanidades. Itinerarios latinoamericanos reformistas y contrarreformistas. Atenea, (522): 21-37. https://doi.org/10.29393/At522-94CPCS10094
Sánchez-Gómez M C, García A 2018. Convergence Between Quantitative and Qualitative Methodological Orientations: Mixed Models. En A. P. Costa, L. P. Reis, F. N. de Souza, & A. Moreira (Eds.), Computer Supported Qualitative Research. 341-357. Springer International Publishing.
Sarmento C 2018. Interculturalism and multiculturalism inthe humanities: Between politics and science [Interculturalidade e multiculturalidade nas humanidades: Entre política e ciência]. Estudos Ibero-Americanos, 44(2):.380-392.
Tejada-Artigas C, Giménez-Toledo E, Oliveira A 2020. El prestigio de las editoriales académicas con libros en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades en Brasil. Transinformação, 32, e190043. .https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0889202032e190043
Torres Perdigón A 2016. ¿Qué papel juegan las humanidades en la lectura y la escritura universitarias? Martha Nussbaum y François Rastier [What's the role of humanities in academic reading and writing processes? Martha Nussbaum and Francois Rastier]. Ikala, 21(3):.313-323
Turin R 2018. Between the disciplinary past and the practical past: Figurations of the historian in the crisis of the humanities. Tempo (Brazil), 24(2): 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1590/tem-1980-542x2018v240201
Verdugo-Castro S, Sánchez-Gómez M C, García-Holgado A, Costa A 2019. Mixed methods and visual representation of data with CAQDAS: empirical study. En M. Á. Conde-González, F. J. Rodríguez Sedano, C. Fernández Llamas, & F.J. García-Peñalvo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2019) (León, Spain, October 16-18, 2019). 511-517. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362847
Weichselbraun A, Kuntschik P, Francolino V, Saner M, Dahinden U, Wyss V 2021. Adapting Data-Driven Research to the Fields of Social Sciences and the Humanities. Future Internet 2021, 13, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13030059
Wolhuter C 2021. Die opstuwende geesteswetenskappe-inskrywings aan Hoëronderwysinstellings wêreldwyd. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, 61(1): 367-382. https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2021/v61n1a21
Downloads
Published
2021-12-28
How to Cite
GUILLÉN-CHÁVEZ, Evelyn-Paola; NÚÑEZ-PACHECO, Rosa; BARREDA-PARRA, Aymé; VERDUGO-CASTRO, Sonia; SÁNCHEZ-GÓMEZ, Mª Cruz. La Producción Científica de Alto Impacto en Humanidades en Iberoamérica: Un Mapeo Sistemático. Fronteiras - Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. 266–279, 2021. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2021v10i3.p266-279. Disponível em: https://revistas2.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/5834. Acesso em: 18 may. 2024.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
This journal offers immediate free access to its content, following the principle that providing free scientific knowledge to the public, we provides greater global democratization of knowledge.
As of the publication in the journal the authors have copyright and publication rights of their articles without restrictions.
The Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science follows the legal precepts of the Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. 
