Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Adoption in Sarawak (Malaysia): Implementation Motivations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2017v6i2.p198-216Resumo
Environmental management has been in the process of evolution since Industrial Revolutions of 18th and 19th centuries. And the more recent is the development of international environmental management standards and guidelines to facilitate global trade. These environmental management standards and guidelines are usually known as Environmental Management Systems (EMS). This research investigates the implementation motivations in relation to EMS adoption in Sarawak, Malaysia organizations. Empirical findings of a survey on the above in Sarawak organizations are presented. About 112 survey questionnaires invitations were forwarded to various organizations in Sarawak and a total of 47 responses were received. The results of this research show that among the Sarawak organizations, the top three implementation motivations or benefits from implementing EMS according to their importance by the Sarawak EMS user’s organizations are 1) Legal compliance as the top benefit of EMS implementation; 2) Improvement in operational environmental protection; and 3) Corporate image advantages.Referências
Accreditation [database on the Internet]. Department of Standards Malaysia (DSM) [updated 2015; cited 2015 December 19]. Available from: http://www.jsm.gov.my/accreditation#.V1VOMPl97IU
British Standards Institution [database on the Internet]. Our History. [updated 2015; cited 2015 December 27]. Available from: http://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/about-bsi/our-history/
Chin KS 1999. Factors Influencing ISO 14000 Implementation in Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing Industry in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(1):123-134.
Conference of Southern County Association (CSCA) [database on the Internet]. The History of EMS [updated 2014; cited 2015 December 28]. Available from: http://www.cscaweb.org/EMS/
Conference on Environment and Development (1992) [database on the Internet]. United Nation Department of Public Information [updated 1997; cited 2015 December 28]. Available from: http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html
Corbett CJ, Russo MV 2001. The Impact of ISO 14001. ISO Management Systems, (December 2001), pp. 23 – 29.
European Commission [database on the Internet]. About EMAS [updated 2015; cited 2015 December 27]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/about/index_en.htm
Fryxell GE, Lo CW, Chung SS 2004. Influence of motivations for seeking ISO 14001 certification on perceptions of EMS effectiveness in China. Environmental Management, 33(2):239-251.
Giles F 2008. Assessing the effectiveness of your environmental management system. Environmental Quality Management, 18(2):1-6.
Ho LL, Law PL 2015a. Impact of Implementation of ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems on Environmental Performance: A Case Study. International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & Technology, 4(1):80-90.
Ho LL, Law PL 2015b. A Review on Benefits and Roles of Implementation; and Major Frameworks of Environmental Management Systems. International Journal of Current Research, 7(4):14446-14450.
International Organization for Standardization 2014. ISO 14001 Continual Improvement Survey 2013: Executive Summary. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
International Organization for Standardization 2015. ISO 14001:2015 (E) Environmental Management Systems – Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
Maier S, Vanstone K 2005. Do good environmental management systems lead to good environmental performance? Ethical Investment Research Services (EIRIS), London.
Malaysian Certified [database on the Internet]. SIRIM QAS International Sdn. Bhd. [updated 2015; cited 2015 December 17]. Available from: http://www.malaysiancertified.com.my/Mgmt Certification.aspx
Marambanyika T, Mutekwa T 2009. Effectiveness of ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems in Enhancing Corporate Environmental Sustainability at Unilever South East Africa in Harare, Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 11(1):280-297.
Nunally JC, Bernstein IH 1994. Psychometric theory, Issue 972. McGraw-Hill, 94 pp.
Performance Track Could Improve Program Design and Management to Ensure Value, Report No. 2007-P-00013 [database on the Internet]. United States Environmental Protection Agency [updated 2007; cited 2016 May 2]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-11/documents/20070329-2007-p-00013.pdf
Ritchie I, Hayes W 1998. A guide to the implementation of the ISO 14000 series on environmental management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Rivera-Camino J 2001. What motivates European firms to adopt environmental management systems? Eco-Management and Auditing, 8(3):134–143.
Scott P 2003. Management systems and sustainable development. ISO Management Systems, September – October 2003, pp. 27-32.
The ISO Survey – 2005 [database on the Internet]. International Organization for Standardization [updated 2005; cited 2014 November 12]. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/survey2005.pdf
USEPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency 2007 [database on the Internet]. Performance Track Could Improve Program Design and Management to Ensure Value, Report No. 2007-P-00013 [WWW] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. [cited 2016 May 02]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ sites/production/files/2015-11/documents/20070329-2007-p-00013.pdf
Walford N 1995. Geographical Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Watson M, Emery ART 2004. Law, economics and the environment: A comparative study of environmental management systems. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(6):760 – 77.
British Standards Institution [database on the Internet]. Our History. [updated 2015; cited 2015 December 27]. Available from: http://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/about-bsi/our-history/
Chin KS 1999. Factors Influencing ISO 14000 Implementation in Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing Industry in Hong Kong. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 42(1):123-134.
Conference of Southern County Association (CSCA) [database on the Internet]. The History of EMS [updated 2014; cited 2015 December 28]. Available from: http://www.cscaweb.org/EMS/
Conference on Environment and Development (1992) [database on the Internet]. United Nation Department of Public Information [updated 1997; cited 2015 December 28]. Available from: http://www.un.org/geninfo/bp/enviro.html
Corbett CJ, Russo MV 2001. The Impact of ISO 14001. ISO Management Systems, (December 2001), pp. 23 – 29.
European Commission [database on the Internet]. About EMAS [updated 2015; cited 2015 December 27]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/about/index_en.htm
Fryxell GE, Lo CW, Chung SS 2004. Influence of motivations for seeking ISO 14001 certification on perceptions of EMS effectiveness in China. Environmental Management, 33(2):239-251.
Giles F 2008. Assessing the effectiveness of your environmental management system. Environmental Quality Management, 18(2):1-6.
Ho LL, Law PL 2015a. Impact of Implementation of ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems on Environmental Performance: A Case Study. International Journal of Engineering Research and Science & Technology, 4(1):80-90.
Ho LL, Law PL 2015b. A Review on Benefits and Roles of Implementation; and Major Frameworks of Environmental Management Systems. International Journal of Current Research, 7(4):14446-14450.
International Organization for Standardization 2014. ISO 14001 Continual Improvement Survey 2013: Executive Summary. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
International Organization for Standardization 2015. ISO 14001:2015 (E) Environmental Management Systems – Requirements with guidance for use. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
Maier S, Vanstone K 2005. Do good environmental management systems lead to good environmental performance? Ethical Investment Research Services (EIRIS), London.
Malaysian Certified [database on the Internet]. SIRIM QAS International Sdn. Bhd. [updated 2015; cited 2015 December 17]. Available from: http://www.malaysiancertified.com.my/Mgmt Certification.aspx
Marambanyika T, Mutekwa T 2009. Effectiveness of ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems in Enhancing Corporate Environmental Sustainability at Unilever South East Africa in Harare, Zimbabwe. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 11(1):280-297.
Nunally JC, Bernstein IH 1994. Psychometric theory, Issue 972. McGraw-Hill, 94 pp.
Performance Track Could Improve Program Design and Management to Ensure Value, Report No. 2007-P-00013 [database on the Internet]. United States Environmental Protection Agency [updated 2007; cited 2016 May 2]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-11/documents/20070329-2007-p-00013.pdf
Ritchie I, Hayes W 1998. A guide to the implementation of the ISO 14000 series on environmental management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Rivera-Camino J 2001. What motivates European firms to adopt environmental management systems? Eco-Management and Auditing, 8(3):134–143.
Scott P 2003. Management systems and sustainable development. ISO Management Systems, September – October 2003, pp. 27-32.
The ISO Survey – 2005 [database on the Internet]. International Organization for Standardization [updated 2005; cited 2014 November 12]. Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/survey2005.pdf
USEPA - United States Environmental Protection Agency 2007 [database on the Internet]. Performance Track Could Improve Program Design and Management to Ensure Value, Report No. 2007-P-00013 [WWW] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. [cited 2016 May 02]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ sites/production/files/2015-11/documents/20070329-2007-p-00013.pdf
Walford N 1995. Geographical Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Watson M, Emery ART 2004. Law, economics and the environment: A comparative study of environmental management systems. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(6):760 – 77.
Downloads
Publicado
2017-09-10
Como Citar
HO, Lee Lee; LAW, Puong Ling; LIM, Soh Fong. Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Adoption in Sarawak (Malaysia): Implementation Motivations. Fronteira: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 198–216, 2017. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2017v6i2.p198-216. Disponível em: https://revistas2.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/fronteiras/article/view/1931. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.
Edição
Seção
Artigos
Licença
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
A partir da publicação realizada na revista os autores possuem copyright e direitos de publicação de seus artigos sem restrições.
A Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science segue os preceitos legais da licença Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional. 
